A recent report published by the International Energy Agency states that meeting the Paris agreement’s climate targets would send demand skyrocketing for the “critical minerals” used to produce clean energy technologies. The figures are particularly dramatic for the raw materials used to manufacture electric vehicles: by 2040, the IEA forecasts that demand for lithium will have increased 42 times relative to 2020 levels.
Lithium batteries are commonly used for portable electronics and electric vehicles and are growing in popularity for military and aerospace. Some would say ‘The lithium-ion battery is an epoch-making invention’.
However, lithium batteries also contain a flammable electrolyte.
Effective April 1, 2016, more stringent regulations were issued by the International Air Transport Association (IATA) for the transport of Lithium Batteries that are packed and shipped as loose/bulk (UN3480/PI965).
There are many different types of lithium batteries. The three main types are described here.
Lithium-ion batteries (Li-ion or LIB batteries) have lithium compounds as the electrode material, and are rechargeable. Li-ion batteries are widely used in portable electronic products such as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, MP3 players and cameras.
Lithium metal batteries have lithium metal as an anode and are generally not rechargeable. They come in different shapes and forms, including the flat, round batteries used in watches. They are also commonly used in products such as calculators or torches.
Lithium-ion polymer batteries
Lithium-ion polymer batteries, often called lithium polymer batteries (Li-poly, Li-Pol, LIP, PLI or LiP), are rechargeable batteries usually composed of several identical secondary cells in parallel.
They are used in some portable electronic products and fall under the family of lithium-ion batteries.
There’s no way to predict when a thermal runaway is going to occur, igniting a lithium battery fire. A thermal runaway starts from an internal short that may be caused by a manufacturing defect, physical damage or heat.
A lithium battery fire also releases an ether-based vapor that’s highly flammable. The chemical reaction of a thermal runaway can release hydrogen and oxygen byproducts, “So this process creates its own fuel, its own ignition and its own oxygen,” said Cox.
Thermal runaway can occur due to an internal short circuit caused by physical damage to the battery or poor battery maintenance. The same type of scenario could cause an external short circuit which could also kick off the chain reaction.
Battery users not only need to handle and use their batteries carefully, but they need to replace them as well. This is because the chemicals and materials degrade over time.
If you have an old battery that has been uncharged or undercharged, it may have built up gasses within the casing. This state can easily cause a battery to explode.
If you see a deformed or “bubbled” battery, do not attempt to charge it. Properly dispose of and replace any deformed batteries.
In Australia it was reported that one of the giga batteries was on fire, giving off toxic fumes. It stated:
A Tesla battery has burst into flames during testing at the site of the southern hemisphere’s largest battery project.
A 13-metric-ton lithium battery caught fire on Friday at the renewable energy plant, called the Victorian Big Battery, near Geelong, about 50 miles from Melbourne. The blaze then spread to an adjacent battery bank, Australia’s ABC reports, but has since been contained.
A toxic smoke warning has been issued in the area. Fire crews will have to wait up to 24 hours for the blaze to die down.
The site is the second Tesla battery project Down Under, following the 2017 installation in South Australia, a facility which Tesla CEO Elon Musk called the “world’s largest” at the time.
Previous blogs, such as the one below, show the process of acquiring non-ferrous metals to create lithium batteries.
Most of us will live within a 25 mile radius of a landfill for household waste. It is often visible from roads nearby as waste trucks drive up and dump the waste and gulls fly over attracted by the chance of food. Maybe even carrion birds such as kites will be seen over the ugly mountains of waste we humans churn out.
Landfill sites are also known as garbage dumps, rubbish dumps, or dumping ground among other names. Landfills are the earliest forms of waste disposal and treatment. Traditionally, the waste would be left to decay or decompose by itself without being buried.
Landfill should be a last resort. Yet it is still a common sight around the world, we even see those living in poverty scrambling amongst the rubbish to find items of value to try to sell in order to buy food.
There was a UK news item in the news recently of a child, born with a lung disorder, whose health was being threatened by the stink form the landfill near his home. That stink was Hydrogen Sulphide.
Here is an extract from a 2016 study about this gas:
Odor emission from landfill sites related to H2S, which has an extremely low odor threshold (around 0.5 ppb)1 and high toxicity, has become an environmental problem, linked with wide-scale public complaint. H2S can cause eye irritation at concentrations as low as 50–100 ppm, and concentrations of 300–500 ppm may result in severe poisoning, leading to unconsciousness and death1. It can seriously endanger human health and ecology safety. The formation of H2S from landfill sites mainly results from anaerobic biological conversion of sulfate by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB)2,3, considered to be obligate anaerobes4.
Many obligate anaerobes live in the human body, in places like the mouth and gastrointestinal tract where oxygen levels are very low. Sometimes, these bacteria can accidentally be deposited where they are not supposed to be, causing serious infection. Some obligate anaerobes include the bacteria which cause gangrene and a number of other infections. ………. microscope slide showing the Clostridium genus of bacteria, responsible for gangrene, tetanus, botulism, colitis, and other serious infections.
The UK Health Protection Agency advises on procedures for management of all threats to human health from landfills. They are obviously concerned about all emissions caused by pollutants. Yet, in 2021, in a so called rich country, our landfill sites are not all well managed.
There are alternatives which should now have replaced all landfills.
Here in the UK we are aiming to be a Zero Waste nation, but that means products we buy for use in the home have to be all biodegradable, and very few exist. We are hyper dependent on plastic, and recycled plastic. Packaging for products still relies on non recyclable plastic, though gradually biodegradable packaging is becoming more common.
We cannot move to Zero Waste until we have solutions to this conundrum of bio-persisting plastics.
We still have landfills around the UK because the householder can only separate out recyclables from non-recyclables and drop appropriate rubbish in appropriate -plastic -bins.
There are companies who now tackle landfill restoration, using sophisticated engineering installations to sanitize the landfill (often in a disused quarry) and create a safe wildlife environment and help reduce CO2 emissions.
Landfill installations which exploit the gas and safely manage it as in this Case Study.
Try as we might, we are not trying hard enough to solve our waste problem. This list of worries was put on a US website.
Only 5% of waste plastic gets recycled with the remaining portion ending up in landfills (3% of it ends up in oceans and rivers)
If the United States converted all its non-recycled plastics into oil, each year the country would produce 5.7 billion gallons of transportation fuel
In 2014, the class of plastics, including sacks, bags, and wraps cost 14.3$ to recycle.
There are more than 2,000 landfills spread throughout the country, we are increasingly exposing our environment to pollution.
Beneath this disguise that we put on landfills to make them look better, there consists toxins and greenhouse gases that are really dangerous. If we continue with this ignorance, future generations will have a lot on their plates to deal with in terms of health. Every emission from the landfills poses a great danger to the surroundings and its survival.
Americans dispose of over 1,200 pounds of organic junk which they can easily compost by getting a container for an apartment composting or building a compost bin in the backyard.
Applying to set up a new landfill site in Queensland, Australia reveals the responsible management of gases and leachate to protect the environment. In reading this document there can be no doubt about old and present landfills around the world which are inflicting terrible harm to the planet.
The annual average exposure levels of Hydrogen Sulphide was 6.3 ng/m3, compared to people living close to larger landfills in Rome whose levels averaged 45.ng/m3. At the end of the follow-up period there were 18,609 deaths.
Respiratory symptoms were detected among residents living close to waste sites. These were linked to inhalation exposure to endotoxin, microorganisms, and aerosols from waste collection and land filling.
This is consistent with other studies; however the association between living proximity to landfill sites and cases of lung cancer is a new finding. The authors stressed that further studies need to be completed to confirm this.
This study has been published in International Journal of Epidemiology.
Anyone who lives close to a landfill site (within 5 km) who also is unlucky enough to contract Covid, even if vaccinated, is more likely to die due to the damage to their health already taking place.
In a previous blog regarding DuPont and Conscious Disregard, I have tried to show how our human behaviour has allowed the growth of petrochemical industries to grow exponentially, thus condemning us to a biopersistent toxicity which is killing all life as we know it. Plastics are so versatile and we cannot imagine life without them, but they are a major contributor as to why our planet has gone into a spiral of death.
Let us look at another petrochemical corporate, Formosa Plastics Corporation:
Formosa Plastics Corporationwas founded in 1954. Its beginnings were challenging as it struggled with high production costs due to small production volume and lack of sufficient end users for the PVC resins being produced at the time. Its solution was to increase production and to build downstream production facilities that would expend the PVC resins.
In 1958, the company established Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, for the purpose of producing secondary products such as plastic, leather and PVC pipes. New Eastern Corporation was subsequently formed to utilize the products coming out of Nan Ya Plastics and turn them into consumer products such as handbags, shoes, suitcases and other such items suitable for the export market. And so it continued with Formosa Plastics expanding product lines and adding downstream production facilities to ensure market for its products. In 1965, the corporation diversified into the textile industry, establishing Formosa Chemicals & Fiber Corporation. By 1974, Formosa had joined the world’s largest fiber producers. Formosa Petrochemical Corporation was formed in 1992 to manage the construction and operation of the company’s naptha cracking plant, oil refinery and co-generation plant.
Formosa Plastics Group includes more than ten Taiwan holdings, including Nan Ya Technology and Formosa Komatsu Silicon Corporation. Altogether, they are involved in businesses as diverse as electronics, oil refinery, textiles, petrochemicals, plastics—raw materials and secondary, and transportation.
The group’ foray into the United States began in 1978. Today, Formosa owns several petrochemical plants, as well as natural gas wells, operating under: Formosa Plastics Corporation America, Formosa Plastics Corporation, USA, and Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America.
In 1978 Jimmy Carter’s tenure as the 39th president of the United States began with his inauguration on January 20, 1977 to 1981.
At the end of President Obama’s tenure, the Republican run state of Texas had negotiated successfully to attract Formosa to Point Comfort.
In 2015, Formosa announced its plans to construct a new, state-of-the art polypropylene production line at its Point Comfort, Texas plant. Officials hope this may be the beginning of a trend to increase polypropylene capacity………..
The above extract introduces this company, well known, immune from prosecution to date, infamous to many who believe they are victims to its conscious disregard.
A view of the US Political Strategy regarding Taiwan in relation to China can be viewed here.
The following is an extract:
During Trump’s time, the US gave Taiwan a lot of unexpected support. From Trump’s first phone call with Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen, to the final moments of Trump’s presidency when former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo lifted “self-imposed restrictions” on contacts between US officials and their Taiwanese counterparts, all of it showed the special support that Taiwan received.
TAIPEI (Reuters) – Formosa Petrochemical Corp. expects faster approval for a planned $9.4 billion petrochemical plant in the U.S. state of Louisiana under the administration of President Donald Trump, the company’s chairman said on Wednesday.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is likely to roll back some of its regulations after the appointment as head last month of Scott Pruitt, who sued the agency multiple times as Oklahoma state attorney general.
The company should benefit from less stringent environmental regulations under the Trumpadministration, Formosa Petrochemical Chairman Chen Bao-lang said. A subsidiary of Formosa’s parent company admitted to massive pollution in Vietnam last year.
“We are more optimistic about the investment,” Chen told Reuters in an interview in the group’s headquarters in Taipei. “At least the obstacles will be fewer… We’re aiming to get an air permit in August 2018.”
Formosa Petrochemical is part of Taiwanese conglomerate Formosa Plastics Group, which has production facilities across Taiwan, China, the United States and Vietnam.
Another Formosa subsidiary, Formosa Ha Tinh Steel, paid $500 million in damages in Vietnam after it admitted last year that it polluted more than 200 km (125 miles) of coastline in April, killing more than 100 tonnes of fish and devastating the environment, jobs and economies of four provinces.
I watched Netflix episode of Dirty Money, investigating Formosa practices at Point Comfort, Texas. I then looked at how this company has attracted environmental harm legal action, but the victims seem to have come off even worse after their attempts to challenge this corporate giant.
As our Planet reels under pressure of man-made climate change catastrophe, it also reels from industrial toxins poisoning the entirety of living things. Plastic producers are major contributors. Petrochemical companies are part of the cause of major CO2 emissions. Their popularity continues to surge. Petrochemicals are rapidly becoming the largest driver of global oil demand. Right when we should be eliminating our dependence on fossil fuels, we are accelerating our demand for it.
FPG was responsible for a serious discharge of toxic pollution from one of its steel complexes. The release resulted in an estimated 115 tons of dead fish washing ashore in Vietnam. The environmental pollution negatively affected the livelihood of 200,000 people including local fishers. In July 2016, FPG pledged to pay compensation to Vietnamese impacted by the environmentally toxic discharge in the amount of $500 million. In February 2018 Hoang Duc Binh was jailed for 14 years for live streaming fisherman travelling to file a lawsuit over the plant’s pollution 
Formosa Plastics has planned the construction of a 9.4 billion dollar fossil fuel plant entitled “The Sunshine Project” in an area of Louisiana that has already been dubbed as “Cancer Alley” due to illnesses caused by pollutants in the environment leaked from existing fossil fuel plants.
A couple of things are important to understand about climate change’s role in extreme weather like this.
First, humans have pumped so much carbon dioxide and other planet-warming greenhouse gases into the atmosphere that what’s “normal” has shifted. A new study, published July 26, 2021, for example, shows how record-shattering, long-lasting heat waves – those that break records by a wide margin – are growing increasingly likely, and that the rate of global warming is connected with the increasing chances of these heat extremes.
Second, not every extreme weather event is connected to global warming.
Shifting the bell curve
Like so many things, temperature statistics follow a bell curve – mathematicians call these “normal distributions.” The most frequent and likely temperatures are near the average, and values farther from the average quickly become much less likely.
The stream of broken temperature records in the North American West lately is a great example. Portland hit 116 degrees – 9 degrees above its record before the heat wave. That would be an extreme at the end of the tail. One study determined the heat wave would have been “virtually impossible” without human-caused climate change. Extreme heat waves that were once ridiculously improbable are on their way to becoming more commonplace, and unimaginable events are becoming possible.
The width of the bell curve is measured by its standard deviation. About two-thirds of all values fall within one standard deviation of the average. Based on historical temperature records, the heat wave in 2003 that killed more than 70,000 people in Europe was five standard deviations above the mean, so it was a 1 in 1 million event.
There’s a basic hierarchy of the extreme events that scientific research so far has shown are most affected by human-caused climate change.
At the top of the list are extreme events like heat waves that are certain to be influenced by global warming. In these, three lines of evidence converge: observations, physics and computer model simulations that predict and explain the changes. At the bottom of the list are things that might plausibly be caused by rising levels of greenhouse gases but for which the evidence is not yet convincing. Here’s a partial list.
5) Reduced spring snowpack: Snow starts accumulating later in the fall as temperatures rise, more water is lost from the snowpack during winter, and the snow melts earlier in the spring, reducing the flush of water into reservoirs that supports the economies of semiarid regions.
7) Hurricanes and tropical storms: These derive their energy from evaporation from the warm sea surface. As oceans warm, larger regions can spawn these storms and provide more energy. But changes in winds aloft are expected to reduce hurricane intensification, so it’s not clear that global warming will increase damage from tropical storms.
8) Extreme cold weather: Some research has attributed cold weather that dips south with the meandering of the jet stream – sometimes referred to as “polar vortex” outbreaks – to warming in the Arctic. Other studies strongly dispute that Arctic warming is likely to affect winter weather farther south, and this idea remains controversial.
9) Severe thunderstorms, hail and tornadoes: These storms are triggered by strong surface heating, so it’s plausible that they could increase in a warming world. But their development depends on the circumstances of each storm. There is not yet evidence that the frequency of tornadoes is increasing.
When extreme heat shatters records
In the new heat wave study, Erich Fischer and colleagues at the Swiss Institute for Atmosphere and Climate Science looked at the frequency of weeklong heat waves that don’t just push the envelope of previous climate, they shatter records by huge margins. The scientists analyzed thousands of years of climate simulations to identify unprecedented heat events and found that global warming caused by coal, oil and gas was commonly associated with such events. In models, these record-shattering weeklong heat waves don’t just gradually increase with global warming but instead strike without warning.
The researchers showed that record-shattering heat is much more likely than it was a generation ago, and that these devastating events will occur much more often over the next few decades. Critically, they found that the likelihood of these unprecedented heat waves is associated with the rate of warming – and that their likelihood decreases markedly when fossil fuel emissions fall.
A warning that can’t be ignored
The catastrophic impacts of extreme weather depend at least as much on people as on climate.
The evidence is clear that the more coal, oil and gas are burned, the more the world will warm, and the more likely it will be for any given location to experience heat waves that are far outside anything they’ve experienced.
Disaster preparedness can quickly fail when extreme events blow past all previous experience. Portland’s melting streetcar power cables are a good example. How communities develop infrastructure, social and economic systems, planning and preparedness can make them more resilient – or more vulnerable – to extreme events.
This article was updated July 26, 2021, with the heat study.
Sugar is a carbohydrate that occurs naturally in many foods. The body mostly uses carbohydrates as an energy source. Food producers also add sugar to many products, which can lead a person’s blood sugar levels to become too high.
Our bodies have always needed sugar as a fuel. We eat carbohydrate foods and the chemical process in our amazing bodies turns the carbohydrates into glucose. The essential glucose will then be carried by our blood, maintaining the blood cells, the central nervous system and the brain.
The article goes on to explain:
The body has a natural feedback mechanism by which high glucose levels lead to increased insulin production, and low levels lead to decreased levels of this hormone. The body requires healthy insulin levels to function properly. If there is too little insulin or it no longer functions properly, a person can develop diabetes.
People with Diabetes are especially vulnerable to the Covid virus. You can see where your country is ranked in relation to others where cases of diabetes are concerned. This website explains:
Development Relevance: Diabetes, an important cause of ill health and a risk factor for other diseases in developed countries, is spreading rapidly in developing countries. Highest among the elderly, prevalence rates are rising among younger and productive populations in developing countries. Economic development has led to the spread of Western lifestyles and diet to developing countries, resulting in a substantial increase in diabetes. Without effective prevention and control programs, diabetes will likely continue to increase.
By viewing the rankings we can see how the Food Industry has impacted countries who had a low incidence of diabetes to having a high incidence. For example, top of the list is Kiribati. They went from 6.60 percent of the 20 to 79 year olds in 2010, to 22.50 percent in 2019. An example of the results of diabetes leading to amputation is highlighted at this prosthetics clinic.
Based on the statistics of United Nations, Kiribati imported US$109 million worth of goods around the world in 2018. Among all the top products imported to Kiribati, Cane Sugar contributes to 1.83% of total trade value, equal to US$2,002 thousand. The second imported is Prepared & Preserved Meat, which accounts for 1.31%. The following table lists the top products imported to Kiribati. Also shown are the trade value and the percentage share for each import category as well as the growth rate during the past 5 years.
The Republic of Kiribati (pronounced Kiribas) is an unusual place. It consists of 33 islands, 32 of which are atolls (an atoll is a ring shaped coral reef) about 4,000 km southwest of Hawaii. Twenty-one of the islands are inhabited and the total land mass is 811 square kilometers. Home to over one hundred thousand people, Kiribati is a country in crisis.
Several problems plague the islands, first there is the problem of climate change – between unusually bad storms and rising ocean levels, there are many on Kiribati who believe their country will quite literally disappear in the next 30-60 years. While many argue the details of the timeline, it is clear that climate change is adversely affecting this group of islands. There is no higher ground to run to, no safety net for the population.
Tarawa is the capital of Kiribati, which is one of the most remote countries on Earth, located on the equator about halfway between Australia and Hawaii. Its atolls are scattered across a patch of the Pacific the size of India, and yet they have a total of just 811 square kilometres of land, about half the size of Greater London.
When a plane lands on Tarawa, a crowd gathers at the airport, drawn by the excitement of the jet making the three-hour flight from Fiji. Aside from occasional freighters bringing canned food, this twice-weekly Fiji Airways flight provides the primary connection to the outside world.
Historically, these Pacific Islanders were once kidnapped and used as slaves on the Queensland plantations of Australia is shown in a film, details of which is shown here.
Sugar Slaves Few people know that the Australian sugar industry was founded on the sweat of men and women enticed or kidnapped from the islands of the South Pacific.Sugar Slavesis the story ofthat human traffic, euphemistically known as “blackbirding”. Between 1863 and 1904 about 60,000 islanders were transported to the colony of Queensland, where they toiled to create the sugar plantations. Then, after the introduction of a White Australia policy (Immigration Restriction Act 1901), most were deported.
In 2014 a report revealed 81.5% of the population were overweight.
Realising the problem of obesity which is caused by junk food consumption, in 2017 the Islanders decided to abandon junk food. They do not need this health issue added to their many other challenges of life in these Pacific Islands.
I hope they can abandon junk food – but it is not easy to do with Big Food inventing strategies to pull victims back into the habit and increasing morbidity as a result.
Author Michael Moss, on page 140 of his book ‘Hooked’, names Northeastern University in Boston, led by Professor Richard Daynard of their Law Faculty for instructing his students to create a database which tracked lawsuits brought by injured smokers. Their database was the basis of research which linked lung cancer to the smoking habit. They would use their data to demonstrate this link at conferences and support attorneys who required definitive evidence to make their case. When the long case against the tobacco giants was settled in 1998, $200 billion was required by them to be paid to the states where their health provision had been impacted by high costs of treating lung disease due to smoking.
Tobacco giants like Philip Morris bought into the food industry, understanding the process of addiction which had generated so many billions of dollars to their companies.
A nutritionist, Marion Nestle, who, Michael Moss tells us was ‘one of the first scholars to argue that the food industry should attract the same kind of scrutiny as the makers of drugs and tobacco’, persuaded the same Law Faculty, led by Richard Daynard, to now take on those companies who make addictive Ultra Processed Foods.
Covid has highlighted the vulnerabilities of people around the world who have become addicted to Ultra Processed Foods. It is not for them to just stop. As with all addictions, it is now becoming a serious topic of research in countries where so many have died of Covid because they suffered underlying ill health caused by poor diet. They did not have sufficient nutrition to help their body fight the disease. Disordered eating has become commonplace. But people look for cheapness, availability and speed of delivery of food to stomach. The food industry makes billions out of ensuring these temptations are in plain sight on ultra processed food presentation to the gullible.
The lobbying of the above NRA in various states in the US in the early 2000s, led to an element of legal protection for food services to not be questioned about the possible links to human obesity. (Commonsense Consumption Act – sometimes referred to as the “cheeseburger bill”, wording drawn up by Meersman of the Colorado Restaurant Association, was passed into law and copied by twenty six states, to protect the corporates from public scrutiny)
Dana Small has conducted some ingenious experiments to understand the evolution of the human body as it learned to acquire fuel, in the form of calories from ancient to present time. When we first foraged for food, we worked hard, chewed hard on roots and tough plants to gain enough calories to give us energy for the search for more fuel, until we had sufficient to rest but stay alert to dangers.
As we learned how to use stones as tools to beat hard foods to pulp, this made chewing easier and helped our digestion. When we learned about fire we could cook foods and widen our range to include meat and fish. We have been active humans for most of our existence, only resting for short periods whilst most of the time was spent using up calories exercising in our work around procuring food and shelter.
Michael Moss covers research Dana Small carried out for PepsiCo, and in 2014 she was terminated from pursuing her interesting findings. One of the executive directors in charge of nutrition said of Dana Small that ‘she was dangerous’, implying her work posed a threat to the high calorie beverage industry
Nowadays, many populations have food to hand in shops or markets. We are not all active, but we can buy in high calorie food and drink and consume it whilst inactive, relaxing watching some form of entertainment. Our bodies still have the process for calculating calorie intake but Dana Small has learned about modern foods and how these have confused our neurological and gut processes. Dana Small has stated, “It’s not so much that people can become addicted to food. It’s that the food has changed, and it is mismatched to us”. She had called this the Mismatch Index.
This 2020 YouTube provides advice on how to eat healthily, lose weight with care, and avoid diseases through understanding the relationship with appropriate food for wellbeing.
Michael Moss in his book ‘Hooked’ revealed the name of another hero we can all be grateful to, the attorney Stephen Joseph.
You can read on his website how he took on Philip Morris, the tobacco giants, who owned Kraft, for their use of trans fats. It simply states ‘He sued Kraft to ban Oreo cookies because they contained trans fat. In response, Kraft removed trans fat from Oreos and all of its products, and many other companies did too.’
Trans Fats (Polyunsaturated fats that have been hydrogenated) – Raises LDL, lowers HDL This is the highest risk fat. (These fats are created when hydrogen is added to vegetable oil to make it more solid, which is why they are often called partially hydrogenated oils.)
Moss explains: ‘This fat had been used originally to make margarine…….’ We all remember the marketing for margarine told us it was ‘just like butter’ but better for our health, ‘good for the heart’ and so on. Many of us changed to this oily substance, but felt a longing for the taste of butter, for margarine tasted nothing like butter.
Researchers were coming up with evidence that margarine actually clogged arteries and contributed to cardiovascular disease. By the time that evidence came out, many of us had been using it for years. The food industry adopted it throughout their product ranges as it preserved the shelf life of ‘cookies, cakes, biscuits, popcorn, doughnuts, breakfast sandwiches, frozen pizza, and fried fast food.‘
Stephen Joseph went to his local supermarket and found it hard to find anything which did NOT contain trans fats. He understood trans fats were not essential to any of their product lines, but they chose to use it. Their scientists must have been aware, as he was, of the emerging evidence of danger to human health.
He was so incensed he determined to expose them and used the Nabisco division of Kraft of the brand Oreo to illustrate the heavy use of trans fats in both the wafer and the creme filling.
On 1st May 2003 he submitted his papers. He asked for the California court to ban the sale of Oreos throughout California, particularly underlining the point that the marketing targeted young children.
Philip Morris had only acquired Nabisco in 2000. They were not familiar with the development of Nabisco products prior to them being seen as sufficiently attractive to a takeover. They had revamped the Oreo brand to make it not only attractive to adults but also mega attractive to children. So whilst one hand of a child played with a toy, the other could reach for the optimally packaged supply of Mini Oreos launched in 2000. The massive success of this addictive, high calorie, trans fat loaded product put them on the map. Increasingly the strategy was to encourage compulsive eating through design.
Kraft simply agreed to remove trans fats from its products and the case ended amicably. Stephen Joseph has highlighted the dangers and the industry has decreased its use trans fats in the US over the past decades. But outside the US it is still a problem in fast foods.
‘Two years into the World Health Organization’s (WHO) ambitious effort to eliminate industrially produced trans fats from the global food supply, the Organization reports that 58 countries so far have introduced laws that will protect 3.2 billion people from the harmful substance by the end of 2021. But more than 100 countries still need to take actions to remove these harmful substances from their food supplies.
Consumption of industrially produced trans fats are estimated to cause around 500,000 deaths per year due to coronary heart disease.
“In a time when the whole world is fighting the COVID-19 pandemic, we must make every effort to protect people’s health. That must include taking all steps possible to prevent noncommunicable diseases that can make them more susceptible to the coronavirus, and cause premature death,” said WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. “Our goal of eliminating trans fats by 2023 must not be delayed.”
Fifteen countries account for approximately two thirds of the worldwide deaths linked to trans fat intake. Of these, four (Canada, Latvia, Slovenia, United States of America) have implemented WHO-recommended best-practice policies since 2017, either by setting mandatory limits for industrially produced trans fats to 2% of oils and fats in all foods or banning partially hydrogenated oils (PHO).
But the remaining 11 countries (Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Ecuador, Egypt, India, Iran, Mexico, Nepal, Pakistan, Republic of Korea) still need to take urgent action.’
Trans fats have not disappeared and can still be found in unexpected places. Always inform yourself before purchasing. For example, I wrote to Violife of Greece, as I eat their vegetarian cheese, and I asked them if they hydrogenate the coconut oil in the cheese. They replied:
“Thank you for your interest in our products and for taking the time to contact us.
The coconut oil used in all Violife products is not hydrogenated. It is highly refined, all protein content has been removed and it is totally allergen free.
The coconut oil used in all Violife products is Refined Bleached Deodorised (RBD).”
I had also asked the Oatley.com oat drink producers about their description on their website of hydrogenation used in their products, they replied:
“Thank you for taking the time to write to us!
You’re totally right, partially hydrogenated fats are something we should look out for! With that said, let me guarantee you that none of our products contain trans fats as we are only using fully hydrogenated fats in the products where we use hydrogenated oils.”
So always ask if you are concerned.
Mid July this year, our UK media covered this National food Strategy Report. But our government are likely to obey the Food Industry lobbyists and shut any such progressive ideas down.
It is really up to us as consumers to understand the trickery to cultivate addiction to unhealthy fake foods from which these corporates make $billions and make those who are addicted grow horribly ill.
The above title is from Michael Moss’s book ‘Hooked’ (p71).
Moss’s book explains how our bodies have evolved since ancestral hominids roamed the Ethiopian landscape. He then brings us up to date with the chemistry of modern processed foods. People in white coats work in labs to synthetically create ‘foods’ which are designed to appeal to our senses.
On p.104, he tells us how the technologists devise synthetic pumpkin spice. They combine at least eighty elements. ‘These include cyclotenes, a group of chemicals that deliver a toasted, maple-like smell; lactones, such as delta-Dodecalactone, which render a creaminess and buttery-like rich milk aroma, with a touch of light fruitiness; sulfurol with its custardy, eggy, creamy, and caramel-like notes; pyrazines with their brown, nutty, caramel-tinged flavor; and vanillin, or 4-hydroxy, 3 methoxybenzaldehyde, the aldehyde family version of real vanilla, creamy and sweet.’
The flavourists will work to provide so many varieties of flavour for industry, and these in turn can be deployed to seduce and trick the senses of consumers with their myriad of consequently addictive products. A product can be devised which has harmful ingredients, leading to a myriad of diseases, but they can taste and smell wonderful, thanks to the brilliance of the concoctions devised by the flavorists. These flavours might not trick an experienced chef or a person who took pride in their cooking from natural ingredients, but some would say the flavours are an improvement on what grows in our natural environment.
Even the undesirable scents of processed foods is masked by special scents devised to conceal the bad smells. The secretive nature of procuring the designed products are a matter of intellectual property and highly protected. Food regulators will not demand the chemical makeup be displayed on the box the consumer picks up. They may instead categorise all the compounds as ‘natural and artificial flavours’. Vanillin is the most seductive to date, being added to more than 18 thousand products, especially vanilla ice cream.
Those food manufacturers who know they are harming our health, target the ‘most vulnerable part of our psyche, where we act on instinct and rote rather than rationalization.’ The processed food industry is worth $1.5 trillion and they will do whatever it takes to snare us and finally hook us into addiction.
Gourmets will know where to source the best vanilla pods and when they add the essence to their chosen dish, they will appreciate the care they have taken will impress their clientele. Read here for details of the most sought after Madagascan vanilla pods. Of course, if you have the right conditions at home you can grow your own, and if you succeed the taste will be good, but unlikely to compete with the best. But you have the satisfaction of knowing you have a real, home grown taste, and not a fake flavour made from chemicals, often based on petrochemicals. Even the anal glands of a beaver can be squeezed to produce what is needed to make vanillin. However, the sap of a certain tree is mostly used to procure the vanillin compound.
If the argument was simply about improving on nature and creating a range of tastes and smells in large quantities to meet demand, then we might say, as resources in farming diminish, this is a good ecological alternative. BUT, it is the creation of fake foods which are not healthy which have had these addictive tastes and smells added to make us eat the products compulsively, that is the main issue here.
None of us wants to know that we have been fooled into buying fake food, but since the 1980s the acceleration of fast foods (fake foods) in our supermarkets has increased from (US figures) six thousand to double that in the 1990s until today approximately thirty-three thousand items with a huge and varied range of chemically created tastes and smells to induce us into addictive eating.
The more that scientists could explain the responses the tandem process of brain and stomach to smell and tastes on the tongue and the olfactory bulb in the nasal cavity, the more information the food industry had to heighten the urge to purchase and endlessly consume their product offerings. The industry has also worked to imitate expensive foods and offer what seems a similar but much cheaper product, appealing to the consumer on both taste and price. Buying more for your money is another gratifying pleasure for most people.
ILSI is a nonprofit, global organization whose mission is to provide science that improves human health, well-being and safeguards the environment. For more than 40 years, ILSI has specialized in convening scientists from academia, as well as the public and private sectors, to collaborate in a neutral forum on scientific topics of mutual interest.
At an annual meeting of the ILSI in 2014, Michael Moss writes, (on p.117 of his book ‘Hooked’) of a researcher who showed the industry how to exploit us in another way and offered ‘some insight into how they can overcome our free will to control our eating habits. Low price, convenience, and variety get a boost when another aspect of our biology gets exploited: our memory.’
She explained that if, whilst distracted when eating by, for example watching TV, that distraction will make us forget the meal we should have focused on and we will continue to eat now that our brain has not registered the food intake. By 2017 new research then found those who were distracted regularly became obese.
Moss states: ‘We eatwhat we remember, but as the food companies know, we eat more when we can be made to forget.’
We can read here a UK 2020 piece of research which explains the dangers from ‘Ultra-Processed Foods and Health Outcomes: A Narrative Review’. Here is an extract:
Of 43 studies reviewed, 37 found dietary UPF exposure associated with at least one adverse health outcome. Among adults, these included overweight, obesity and cardio-metabolic risks; cancer, type-2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases; irritable bowel syndrome, depression and frailty conditions; and all-cause mortality. Among children and adolescents, these included cardio-metabolic risks and asthma. No study reported an association between UPF and beneficial health outcomes.
Ultra processed foods make us ill, so ill we are more likely to die prematurely. Our health systems cannot keep up. Our pharmaceutical industries constantly supply us with drugs to combat or manage these diseases. If we have less money to spend on food we will buy the cheaper ultra processed foods. As we get progressively ill, we will not be able to afford medical bills if we live in a country where ‘free at the point of need’ does not exist. If we do live in the UK, we can access the NHS for assistance but the NHS is underfunded and understaffed and overwhelmed, especially now due to Covid.
The spread of processed foods has become global with major corporations opening up outlets in parts of the world who had pride in their slow and beautifully crafted, carefully sourced foods. Diabetes 2 has become an illness where it was unknown until the western diet penetrated their cultures. This illness makes people far more vulnerable to Covid, as we have seen in India this year.
When I was at school, because I was female, I was taught Domestic Science to prepare me for marriage and raising a family. Although it was an insult to women to think that was all we were good for, I do think that all children should be taught how to choose organic foods where possible and how to avoid ultra processed foods. Learning to create tasty meals carefully sourced yet on a tight budget, is a practical and healthy approach to self care when one leaves home.
Covid should have given us a ‘wake-up’ call to change the way forward and work out how to extinguish toxins from our environment which make us fall victims to so much illness unnecessarily.
So look for advice if you are unsure how to avoid Ultra Processed Food, for example here, and below an extract
Here are five easy ways to reduce your intake.
● Read ingredient lists carefully. The shorter, the better. Avoid anything that contains hydrogenated oils, artificial flavors or strange-sounding substances you don’t recognize that the manufacturer says are put there to maintain freshness. “All the ingredients should look like something you could make in your own kitchen,” Katz says. This is true even if it’s a seemingly healthy staple such as an energy bar, a protein shake or even a plant-based milk drink. These have all gotten a health halo though they can be ultra-processed foods, says Julie Stefanski, a nutritionist in Morrisville, N.C., and spokeswoman for the Academy of Nutrition & Dietetics.
● Make it yourself. It can be easier than you think to whip up your own staple items. “It takes less than a minute to stir together with a salad dressing with ingredients you have on hand, such as olive oil, balsamic vinegar, and herbs and spices,” Stefanski says. Instead of spending money on a premade protein shake, create your own with low-fat milk, frozen fruit and a tablespoon of natural nut butter. Instead of a sugary fruit-flavored yogurt, opt for the plain variety and sweeten it with fruit.
●Shop smartly. When you hit the supermarket, focus on the perimeter. That’s where most of the unprocessed fare — think to produce, legumes, nuts, dairy, meat, and fish — are located. Don’t shy away from canned or frozen fruits, veggies, broth or meats, either. Although these are considered “processed” foods, they weren’t associated with an increased risk of death or disease, Lawrence says.
●Skip creams and sweeteners in coffee or tea. Most powdered and flavored liquid creams are simply dried high-fructose corn syrup, Stefanski says. Lighten your drink with a splash of milk instead.
●Plan snacks in advance. Most of the time, we reach for processed foods because it’s convenient. Carry snacks such as homemade trail mix or fruit with nut butter with you, so you can nosh when hunger hits instead of attacking the vending machine.
I have just purchased this book, ‘Hooked’ by journalist Michael Moss. Another leading light in the effort to show we have been made ill by those who worship the mantra ‘profit before people’. Corporates employ scientists to find our vulnerabilities in order to ensure that what we put in our mouths will become addictive, generating sales ad infinitum if left unchallenged.
Michael Moss, a few pages into the book, mentioned the name of the great lawyer (in my mind) John Banzhaf. I never knew his name until I read this book, but my life quality has benefitted since he founded ASH. As a chronic asthma sufferer, the impact of his work has caused laws in the UK to change in order to prohibit smoking in public places. As a singer, I was able to perform in venues without developing an asthma attack if I tried to sing where smoking used to be allowed.
He was the lawyer who inspired John Bilott (see my earlier blogs related to his work) to accelerate the class action he was working on.
Michael Moss tells us that ‘ in 1997, Banzhaf had helped engineer the legal assault which brought the tobacco industry to its knees. Rather than relying on individuals to sue the cigarette manufacturers for damaging their health, the new strategy involved states bringing lawsuits against the manufacturers for wrecking the budgets of the health agencies that had to care for sick smokers. This was a stroke of genius that frames the issue in dollars and cents instead of individual moral judgments, and in 1998, the tobacco companies caved. They agreed to curtail their worst marketing practices and spend $246 billion on measures to counteract the medical harm they had done.’
We may or may not choose to smoke a cigarette, and if we do, and we live in the US or UK, we are more than likely aware of the dangers to our health and the health of those around us.
But what of those who grow the tobacco? It is best grown in warm and dry climates.
In 2019 these were the leading tobacco growing countries:
While the China National Tobacco Corporation (CNTC) produces nearly half the world’s cigarettes, almost all of them have been consumed at home.
The article goes on to say:
The companies most often referred to collectively as Big Tobacco –– Philip Morris International (PMI), British American Tobacco (BAT), Imperial Brands and Japan Tobacco International (JTI) –– have all been hit over the years with scandals involving smuggling and unethical advertising.
In its expansion strategies, CNTC has taken a leaf from the playbook of its “Big Tobacco” competitors, according to Mackay, who advises the WHO on implementing the FCTC.
“As a template, you couldargue this is just what China is doing now,” said Mackay. “It’s not different from what they’ve learnt from the rest of the world.”
And China Tobacco has done it well. According to a 2019 estimate by its largest competitor, PMI, China Tobacco controls about 45 percent of the global market of cigarettes and heated tobacco units. That’s a bigger share than PMI, BAT, JTI and Imperial Brands combined.‘
There is such a demand for cigarettes, that smuggling tobacco has and still is a major activity.
Reading about it here raises awareness of the supply and demand criminal trade.
‘Tobacco companies have facilitated the smuggling of their own cigarettes and roll your own tobacco for decades. Internal company documents reveal that in the 1990s smuggling was an integral part of tobacco companies’ business strategies. By the late 1990s and early 2000s, the tobacco industry’s involvement in smuggling had been exposed leading to public investigations, court cases and extremely negative publicity for the tobacco companies. Using a massive public relations drive, they claimed they had changed and were now the victims, not the perpetrators of tobacco smuggling. But contemporary evidence indicates significant ongoing tobacco company involvement in the illicit tobacco trade.12………………
The article goes on to say:
‘Major tobacco companies have an extensive history of facilitating the illicit trade. By the late 1990s, it was estimated that one third of global annual cigarette exports could not be accounted for via legal distribution routes.6 Despite the tobacco industry knowing that cigarette smuggling increased sales to children, documents from the Truth Industry Documents Archive and other evidence has shown the extensive involvement of the industry in facilitating smuggling by shipping huge quantities of cigarettes to ‘smuggling hubs’. The cigarettes were then forwarded via these hubs via the black market, often back to the countries from where they were shipped.‘
When corporates lose legal battles in litigious countries like the USA, they will find other routes to maintain their wealth and production.
This science article explains why it is so hard to quit smoking. Here is an extract:
This component of addiction is known as negative reward and is controlled in part by a region of the brain called the habenula. The neurotransmitters acetylcholine and glutamate are thought to influence nicotine dependence in the habenula, but the molecular details of this regulation are unclear.
This article describes where the habenula is and explains it is a relatively new area of the brain found by neuroscientists. The knowledge gained will no doubt benefit us all over time, but any scientists working for corporates may redirect the knowledge into more sinister avenues.
It is not hard to find stressed people in this world. The fact that nicotine is a poison should warn people that any form of liquid nicotine (as in e-cigarettes) can be lethal. Not only do stressed people take up smoking, but in trying to quit, will switch to e-cigarettes. Targeting stressed people with a poison is an even more abhorrent crime. They are not responsible for their cigarette habit, though they might think they are. They might think smoking makes them seem stronger, more independent. But they will lose their ability to taste healthy food and even any food will not be as important to them as the cigarette. This is a sad situation.
We now have transnational organized crime networks which are sophisticated and successful. They are successful because they have millions of addicted customers, who may smoke themselves to death and nobody cares.
Tobacco kills more than 8 million people each year. More than 7 million of those deaths are the result of direct tobacco use while around 1.2 million are the result of non-smokers being exposed to second-hand smoke.
Over 80% of the world’s 1.3 billion tobacco users live in low- and middle-income countries.
So far, Covid (according to Worldometer) has killed 3,918,881 to date (26th June, 2021) over the past 18 months. Many of those deaths, similar to those who die from smoking cigarettes, are people who live in low- and middle-income countries.
Tobacco growing and smuggling of tobacco is an act of Malice, Conscious Disregard of fellow human beings by those who are part of these transnational smuggling networks.
I had a great aunt who made cigars in a factory before she was married. Many of my family smoked, my father, especially, was totally hooked. During World War II, cigarettes were given to the members of the armed forces and many people at home. They were told it would help them feel less stressed. Cigarettes were promoted as ‘good for your health’. A pack of cigarettes could be exchanged for goods and favours. They were a mode of currency and still are. Like other poisons which gradually kill you, cigarettes seemed to de-stress people just as the adverts suggested. We now understand how that happens, thanks to neuroscience. But there was a point in history where scientists began to link nicotine to premature deaths, usually as a result of lung cancer. But even when that was known, the tobacco companies refused to take responsibility.
I am glad that raising awareness and bringing in laws to reduce the places where smoking is allowed has been shown to improve the life chances of many people in the UK. It is no longer seen as a sexy habit as it was in the movies until the law changed that kind of promotion.
An interesting selection of photos on the subject of smoking and tobacco is worth viewing with all the experiences around the world is here.
This is one of the pictures from the above collection:
I previously wrote about the poison Chromium VI which has leached into the rivers and streams of Glasgow City since Shaw Chemicals once processed chemicals in the highly industrial 19th and 20th centuries. Later, in April, I wrote about Industrial Chromium.
Just last month GlasgowLive ran a feature on a horrific image of leaching of the poison into a local river.
What do SEPA (Scottish Environmental Protections Agency) say about it? Efforts to remediate such poisoned land and soil are under way. But how many people have died from being poisoned by Chromium VI since the Shawfield area was contaminated over at least 80 years?
The area is being remediated through a funding body, Clyde Gateway. They said:
Clyde Gateway also confirmed at the time that there were still significant areas of land in the Shawfield area that had not been remediated, with discussions underway with a number of stakeholders – including the Scottish Government – to secure funding to complete the essential work which would improve water quality in the area.
Glasgow, (a major conurbation in Scotland) perhaps not surprisingly, suffers a higher rate of cancer than other European countries. The Chromium VI alone has not been removed from the region, as in the US, it seems it leaches into the groundwater and expands over time.
People cannot be blamed for drinking bottled water, if they can afford it, rather than drink water straight from the tap. Plastic bottles which have contained water often find their way into the Oceans. Factories which produce the bottles also pollute with chemicals as we know so well.
The ongoing battle to give Americans safe drinking water, free of chemicals, especially Chromium VI.
In the 1990s, Erin Brokovitch worked for a small law firm in Hinkley, California. She was a single parent with three children and was highly motivated to earn enough to pay her bills, getting no financial help from anyone. She worked diligently as a law clerk, and she spotted something in the files which made her ask questions, and the busy firm allowed her to seek the answers.
This led to unearthing evidence that the local industry of Pacific Gas & Electric ( PG&E ) had, since the 1950s, used the highly toxic hexavalent chromium, also known as Chromium-6, to kill algae and protect the metal at its natural gas pumping station in Hinkley. Starting in 1952, the power company began mixing a toxic form of chromium with water to prevent rust at a new pipeline pumping station in Hinkley, a remote desert community united by a single school and a general store. PG&E dumped the chromium-laced water into a pond. The plume of contaminated groundwater has been growing ever since, and to the present day is still growing.
Hexavalent chromium is a highly reactive chemical that damages cells. The known health effects range from skin irritation to lung and stomach cancers. In the 1990s, hundreds of Hinkley residents claimed illnesses and other damages stemming from the contaminated water.
In 1996, Erin Brockovich helped more than 600 Hinkley residents win $333 million in settlements from PG&E for cancers and other illnesses they blamed on the chromium-tainted water from their wells. Their story was made famous in the 2000 movie “Erin Brockovich.”
Sadly, the American system will not risk losing industries and therefore impact the economy and accepts needless harm from polluters will kill their citizens as a price worth paying. In 2004 an article strongly refuted the claim that Chromium VI could have such serious impacts on human health.
You only need to look at the list of members to learn this is a lobbying group of all the leading chemical industry corporates.
Lawyers deliberately confused the public about Chromium in the water, only referring to the variations which are not toxic. Anyone can look up the benefits of Chromium III and read Chromium (III)(Cr3+) is an essential trace element, which is required for normal protein, fat, and carbohydrate metabolism. It helps in converting glucose into energy, promoting healthy blood glucose and blood pressure levels, and enhancing lean body mass by suppressing appetite.
We cannot have industry scientists reporting to their employers that some life endangering chemical is being released into the environment due to the activities of the company, only for them to be ordered to stall the public knowledge of this finding – see below cover of this report.
For the past 60 years, water polluted with chromium (VI) has plagued Hinkley, Calif., the desert town made famous by the film “Erin Brockovich.” Although residents there won their lawsuit against the polluter, Pacific Gas & Electric Co., there’s still a debate over whether the compound causes cancer in drinking water. The Environmental Protection Agency says yes, but industry scientists disagree.
Tens of millions of Americans drink water contaminated with chromium (VI), a compound the Environmental Protection Agency was poised in 2011 to conclude likely causes cancer. That finding would set the stage for setting stricter drinking-water standards.
The National Toxicology Program, part of the National Institutes of Health, published a major rodent study in 2008 that concluded there was “clear evidence” chromium (VI) in water was a carcinogen.
The EPA’s assessment of chromium was delayed to wait for new studies paid for by the American Chemistry Council, the chemical industry’s main trade group and lobbyist.
Some of the same industry-paid scientists involved in past efforts to stall government action on chromium worked on the studies delaying the EPA.
After delays of nearly a decade, the California Environmental Protection Agency declined to wait for the industry studies and issued its own finding in 2011 that chromium was a carcinogen in drinking water.
The EPA initially planned to complete its chromium (VI) assessment in 2015.
After the Center for Public Integrity and PBS NewsHour started asking questions about the delay, EPA posted a revised timetable for completing the assessment this year.
The American Chemistry Council (ACC), formerly known as the Manufacturing Chemists’ Association (at its founding in 1872) and then as the Chemical Manufacturers’ Association (from 1978 until 2000), is an industry trade association for American chemical companies, based in Washington, D.C.
You can read a study explaining the occurrence of toxic groundwater from ancient history to present day which explains additional toxins put there by human carelessness. In other words, the tendency to protest about ancient toxins rather than modern man-made toxins is often used as a dismissal of the corporate harmful product processes.
Those responsible for contaminating the water supply should fund a water filtration plant for all customers they have knowingly harmed.
An example of such a plant is the more recently built $600 million Seymour-Capilano water filtration plant (the largest in Canada), or the Coquitlam Water Treatment Plant described below.
Erin Brokovich, in the image above, says she will always drink bottled water. We hope she can stop doing so to help save the planet from harmful effects of the bottled water industry, and ensure she adopts an in-home filtration system. Unlike many people, I think she can afford it.
The last thing we want is the desperate alternative of bottled water. You can read of the problems of plastic bottles polluting the planet, of water in bottles often coming from the same source as tap water, the depletion of aquifers by drilling down to them and so on. You can never be sure the bottled water you have paid for has no dangerous chemicals in it, like arsenic, chromium and others which water authorities have to continually test for in tap water.
People may choose a filtration system which fits in their own home which purport to provide UV filtration. An example is this company product. We must never be complacent about our consumption of tap water, but if a prestigious engineering project such as the Canadian example was a norm for all countries to implement as vital infrastructure, we would have no bottled water problems and no populations being poisoned by their local water supply.