The killing of Rabin

Extract from “Rise and Kill First”, by Ronen Bergman:

1995

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 2, a senior member of the VIP protection unit of the Shin Bet, responsible for the safety of the prime minister, made an encrypted phone call to a colleague, Yitzhak Ilan, who was in charge of intelligence collection for the agency’s southern region. “The day after tomorrow in the evening,” the caller told Ilan, “there’s going to be a huge rally in Tel Aviv’s Kings of Israel Square, in support of the government and the peace process. Rabin will be speaking. Since the hit on Fathi Shaqaqi, have you got any info on whether Islamic Jihad aims to avenge their leader by trying to kill the prime minister?”

Ilan replied that there was no specific information, but there was a lot of agitation in the area in the wake of the Shaqaqi assassination, and although Israel hadn’t taken responsibility for it, the PIJ had no doubt who was behind it. Ilan’s chief concern was that there might be a car bomb at the rally, and he recommended clearing the whole area around the square of vehicles. After their conversation, the VIP protection unit decided to put on extra precautions.

The peace rally was organized by left-wing groups as a counter to the angry protests the right had been staging, which had become spectacles of vicious incitement against Rabin. Pictures of him were set aflame, he was depicted in the uniform of the Nazi SS, and coffins bearing his name were carried along. At some of these protests, demonstrators had tried, and almost succeeded, to break through the security cordon and attack him. Shin Bet chief Gillon warned that Jewish terrorists might try to harm a government leader, and he even asked Rabin to travel in an armor-plated car and to wear a flak jacket. Rabin, who didn’t take Gillon’s warnings seriously, recoiled at the latter idea, and complied only on rare occasions.

The rally was a great success. Although Rabin had doubted that the supporters of the left would come out and demonstrate, at least a hundred thousand crammed into the square and cheered for him. They saw Rabin, generally a very introverted man, showing rare emotion. “I want to thank each one of you for standing up against violence and for peace,” he began his speech. “This government … has decided to give peace a chance. I’ve been a military man all my life. I fought wars as long as there was no chance for peace. I believe there is now a chance for peace, a great chance, and it must be taken.

“Peace has enemies, who are trying to harm us in order to sabotage peace. I want to say, without any ifs or buts: We have found a partner for peace, even among the Palestinians: the PLO, which was an enemy and has ceased terror. Without partners for peace there can be no peace.”

Afterward, Rabin shook hands with the people on the platform and headed for the armor-plated car waiting nearby, accompanied by his bodyguards. Shin Bet security personnel saw a young, dark-skinned man standing in the prime minister’s path. But because of his Jewish appearance, they did not try to move him out of the way. The young man, Yigal Amir, a law student close to the extremist settlers in Hebron, slipped past Rabin’s bodyguards with astonishing ease and fired three shots at the prime minister, killing him.

In 2015, an article in the Conversation appeared, here is part of it:

The Oslo process, which culminated with the awkward handshake between Rabin and Yasser Arafat on the White House lawn in September 1993, established limited self-rule for Palestinians and entailed an Israeli redeployment from the West Bank, territory that Amir believed to be the biblical birthright of the Jewish people.

The 1990s – a relatively secure decade

Rabin knew that by the 1990s, Israel was more secure than it had ever been since its establishment in 1948.

By the time he became prime minister (for the second time) in 1992, Israel had a peace treaty with Egypt and a close alliance with the United States. It was the strongest military power in the region, with the most advanced weapons systems and a powerful domestic arms industry, while its most vociferous enemies – Iraq and the Palestine Liberation Organization – had either been defeated (Iraq in the First Gulf War) or were at the nadir of their influence and appeal (the PLO at the end of the First Intifada). It was also in the early 1990s that the country established diplomatic relations with key states in the world, including Russia, China and India. Israel could, Rabin felt, afford a peace process with the Palestinians.

Disinformation is dangerous. We fight it with facts and expertise

That realism also led Rabin to the belief that a Palestinian state was inevitable as a result of Oslo, as he told his close aide Eitan Haber (who in turn told me during an interview).

Yasser Arafat and Yitzhak Rabin on the White House lawn. Gary Hershorn/Reuters

Rabin didn’t like or trust Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, and it’s not clear whether he had a sense of what such a state would look like. But he knew ruling over another people was no longer viable. And he was already thinking about Iran as the primary strategic threat to the country.

At the same time, however, Rabin was capable of using brute force when he deemed it necessary.

A ‘risk’ for peace?

Rabin’s “break their bones” instructions regarding Palestinian protesters and rioters in the First Intifada helped legitimize a harsh Israeli response to civilian rallies against the occupation.

He used deportation and border closures as he thought necessary. In other words, he did not hesitate to use force and coercion. But he was, at the same time, willing to innovate for the sake of Israeli security, and to adopt nonmilitary means as well.

It’s become a cliché to talk of “risks for peace,” and Rabin used similar language in defending Oslo.

But Rabin didn’t see things as gambles. As a military man, he saw issues as having best solutions, which might still fail. But it was important to try.

Almost all of Israel’s leaders have dismissed this part of his legacy – his willingness to take risks. Even those on the left and in the center worry that the Israeli public doesn’t want to hear about an end to the occupation while Palestinian terrorism continues. Unlike Rabin, they have been unwilling to confront public opinion on the matter.

A golden era for Jewish-Arab relations in Israel

There is another important issue of Yitzhak Rabin’s time in office that has been eclipsed in the past 20 years.

Rabin’s second tenure as prime minister is known as the “golden era” of Jewish-Arab relations in Israel. Rabin paid more attention to Arab citizens of Israel, about 20% of the population, than any other Jewish Israeli leader had before or has since.

In addition to directing more resources to the community, he responded to their concerns by dropping the traditional paternalistic attitude the Zionist parties had long held regarding the Arab minority.

Perhaps more importantly, for the first and only time, Arab political parties played an indirect role in policymaking.

In 1993, as a result of the Oslo accords, Rabin lost his majority in the Knesset, the Israeli parliament. Two Arab parties propped him up from outside his own coalition, voting with the government on no-confidence measures brought by the opposition.

Rabin’s views on Israel’s Arab minority reflected his analysis of Israeli-Palestinian relations more broadly – namely, that coercion was simply untenable as a solution to Israel’s relations with Palestinians inside and outside of Israel.

Since 1995, Arab citizens have either disengaged from the political process or voted for Arab parties in increasing numbers, at the expense of Rabin’s party, Labor. The percentage of Arab citizens’ votes for the top three Arab parties, for example, has climbed from 68.7% in 1999 to 80% in 2015.

https://theconversation.com/what-is-the-legacy-of-yitzhak-rabin-49794

Posted in anthropocene | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

If it’s digital, it’s hackable

President Bukele had high hopes for Bitcoin in 2022.

El Salvador became the first country in the world to use bitcoin as legal tender, after it was adopted as such by the Legislative Assembly of El Salvador in 2021.[1] It has been promoted by Nayib Bukele, the president of El Salvador, who claimed that it would improve the economy by making banking easier for Salvadorans, and that it would encourage foreign investment. In 2022, more Salvadorians had Bitcoin Lightning wallets than bank accounts……..

In March 2025, The Economist wrote that El Salvador’s bitcoin experiment had been a failure, bringing more costs than benefits to the El Salvador economy.[4]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin_in_El_Salvador

On 10th March 2025, North Korean Lazarus Group hacked ByBit crypto exchange and stole £232m unrecoverable funds. Once exchanged into traditional currency, a trick they are also adept at, the funds contribute to the North Korea military build up.

Investigator Dr Tom Robinson of Elliptic, explains this group are highly diligent and sophisticated in cyber hacking and laundering funds acquired in this way. They have round the clock operations. They are highly successful at what they do.

Just a month earlier they stole 401,000 Ethereum coins from a wallet of one of ByBit’s suppliers by secretly altering the digital address the coins were being sent to.

Bybit’s CEO Ben Zhou, had to assure customers their funds were safe, having to obtain loans from investors to replenish the lost funds.

Dr Dorit Dor of Checkpoint doesn’t think the funds are likely to be recoverable due to the closed isolation of North Korea.

The attraction of crypto currency exchange is its private and anonymous nature and anyone who can trace and track customers successfully, maybe to catch criminals, would undermine the safety of funds of legitimate users.

The companies involved in the industry seem to have poor security in place. Thus the Lazarus Group target them.

2019 UpBit hacked for $40m

KuCoin hacked for $275m

2022 Ronin Bridge hacked for $600

Atomic Wallet hacked for $100m

Just take a look at Justin Sun, who brought in ‘stablecoin’.

Justin Sun is a Chinese-born Kittitian crypto billionaire and businessperson. He is the founder of TRON, a cryptocurrency with an associated blockchain DAO ecosystem and USDD, a stablecoin issued by TRON DAO Reserve. Wikipedia

He invested millions in Trump’s World Liberty Financial crypto project. The deal made was to make the Trump family enriched with 75% of the tokens revenues.

By its nature, crypto offers a particularly easy way to, anonymously or otherwise, funnel money into assets that directly benefit the president and his family.

………SEC, America’s top financial regulator, which two years ago charged Sun and his companies — Tron, BitTorrent and Rainberry — with selling unregistered securities and fraudulently manipulating the price of digital token Tronix. Sun and his companies sought to have the case dismissed……….

………Meanwhile, in a widely expected move, the SEC on Thursday officially dropped its enforcement action against US crypto exchange Coinbase, citing “the Commission’s ongoing efforts to reform and renew its regulatory approach to the crypto industry.”………

“Now anyone in world can essentially deposit money into bank account of President of USA with a couple clicks,” tweeted Anthony Scaramucci, former Trump White House communications director, after Trump launched a digital token known as a memecoin last month. “Every favor — geopolitical, corporate or personal — is now on sale, right out in the open.”

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/02/28/business/crypto-mogul-trump-coins-civil-fraud-charges/index.html

The lesson seems to be to become an isolated country and emulate the Lazarus Group approach. From evidence of the current administrations use of cryptocurrency, the US might be going in that direction.

Posted in anthropocene | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The dark side of the plate

Chronic illness is caused by over consumption of:

Alcohol

Tobacco

Salt

Sugar

Ultra processed foods

And the health system is overwhelmed by the consequences.

Yet there are huge industries involved who have powerful lobbyists. 

Government must not be contaminated by such lobbying. Instead it must reverse the permeation of these 5 causes of such chronic diseases. Then costs will reduce exponentially once addictions to these harmful food industry products are managed.

Corporate Lobbying briefing

Report

Corporate Lobbying: The Dark Side of the Plate

03/04/2025

The extent to which corporate lobbying and conflicts of interest are negatively impacting food policy and our diets is a growing matter of concern.

UK dietary health is at a crisis point and the cost of our poor diets is ravaging the NHS, hampering economic growth, and ultimately impacting the long-term sustainability of food businesses.

Yet it needn’t be this way. Lobbying is an essential part of an open and consultative policymaking process which, if done transparently, can empower corporations, organisations and citizens to participate in the democratic process.

This briefing presents initial findings from research conducted by The Food Foundation and others that has begun to explore the extent of food industry lobbying in the UK.

https://foodfoundation.org.uk/publication/corporate-lobbying-dark-side-plate

Posted in anthropocene | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Globalisation and Gangsterism

The post-Second World War order began to crumble in the first half of the 1980s. Its dissolution followed no obvious pattern, occurring instead as a series of seemingly disparate events: the spectacular rise of the Japanese car industry; communist Hungary’s clandestine approach to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to explore a possible application for membership; the stagnation of India’s economy; President F.W. de Klerk’s first discreet contacts with the imprisoned Nelson Mandela; the advent of Deng Xiaoping’s reforms in China; Margaret Thatcher’s decisive confrontation with Britain’s trade-union movement. Individually, these and other events seemed to reflect the everyday ups and downs of politics; at most they were adjustments to the world order. In fact, powerful currents below the surface had provoked a number of economic crises and opportunities, especially outside the great citadels of power in Western Europe and the United States, that were to have profound consequences for the emergence of what we now call globalisation.

Above quote from book ‘McMafia: seriously organised crime’ by Misha Glenny, the author continues:

There was one development, however, that had its roots firmly in America and in its primary European ally, Britain. The world was taking its first steps towards the liberalisation of international financial and commodity markets. American and European corporations and banks had begun to prise open markets that had hitherto maintained strict controls on foreign investment and currency exchange. Then came the fall of communism in 1989, first in Eastern Europe and then in the mighty Soviet Union itself. Out of ideas, short of money and beaten in the race for technological superiority, communism fizzled out in days rather than years. This was a monumental event, which fused with the processes of globalisation to trigger an exponential rise in the shadow economy. These huge economic and political shifts affected every part of the planet. Overall there was a significant worldwide upsurge in trade, investment and the creation of wealth. That wealth was, however, distributed very unevenly. Countless states found themselves cast into the purgatory that became known as ‘transition’, a territory with ever-shifting borders. In these badlands, economic survival frequently involved grabbing a gun and snatching what you could to survive.

One infamous Bratva international organized crime gangboss, born 1946 in Kyiv, Ukraine, still survives in Moscow, well known around the world – Semion Mogilevich. Plenty to read on him on the Internet, for example:

https://allthatsinteresting.com/semion-mogilevich

This man has moved in the highest political circles, using his leverage to get rival gangs caught and jailed in European countries. This man honed his skills and psychopathic tendencies to spare no compassion for his chosen victims. The emergence of global trade ensured he spread his tentacles and influence worldwide. It is people like him who have understood how to retain power over their lifetime.

He earned a bachelor degree in economics which helped him understand the world economy. He paired that with a fondness for violence.

Born on June 30 or July 6, 1946, in Kiev in the Ukrainian Soviet Union,
Semion Yudkovich Mogilevich was raised in the Podol neighborhood
by Jewish parents. The ambitious young criminal launched his career
in the 1980s by scamming fellow Russian Jews who simply sought to
emigrate to Israel or America.
Mogilevich promised Jewish families that he would purchase their
assets, sell them legally for a fair market value, and then graciously
return the proceeds, but as one might expect, he simply pocketed the
money. He served two prison terms for this stunt.
Meanwhile, many of those Soviet Jews he defrauded settled in the
Brighton Beach area of Brooklyn, New York, and established their own
mob. Donald Trump would become embroiled with these characters,
as they bailed him out of a series of bankruptcies..

Charlie Sykes covers reactions to the attack on the American economy, using tariffs as a weapon, and also lists some of Trump’s bankruptcies and failures:

Charlie Sykes

Even as the markets plunged, businesses reeled, and our former allies girded their loins for a global trade war, analysts struggled to make sense of the president’s decision to wreak havoc on the economy.

“It’s hard to know which is more unsettling,” wrote the editors of the Economist, “that the leader of the free world could spout complete drivel about its most successful and admired economy. Or the fact that on April 2nd, spurred on by his delusions, Donald Trump announced the biggest break in America’s trade policy in over a century—and committed the most profound, harmful and unnecessary economic error in the modern era.”

The Financial Times calls Trump’s tariffs, “one of the greatest acts of self-harm in American history. They will wreak untold damage on households, businesses and financial markets across the world, upending a global economic order that America benefited from and helped to create.”

Trump is a true-believer who’s had a fetish for tariffs for decades — and his ignorance of global trade is profoundly 19th century. But the bizarre tariffs still came as a shock, especially to those in the business community who told themselves that surely Trump was merely bluffing; surely this pro-business president would not trash the economy; surely, he would listen to reason.

But Trump is not governing as a conservative; he is not pursuing incremental or coherent change. By now it should be obvious that on one issue after another — race, gender, deportations, DOGE, universities, law firms, pardons, foreign policy — his agenda is profoundly radical, driven more by his id than any ideology or plan.

So once again, he turned the world upside down. This Republican president — the same one who switched sides in the Russia-Ukraine war last month — unilaterally imposed $6 trillion in new taxes — the largest tax increase in American history. As CNN notes: “Even when adjusting for inflation, that amount would be triple the tax increase put in place in 1942 to pay the cost of fighting World War II.”

This is to economics what creationism is to biology, astrology is to astronomy, or RFK thought is to vaccine science. The Trump tariff policy makes little sense EVEN if you believe in protectionist mercantilist economics.

Trump’s tariffs targeted two islands populated by pengiuns, but somehow exempted Russia, Belarus and North Korea.

But, insists Howard Lutnick: Let Donald Trump run the global economy. What could possibly go wrong?

Here again, let’s connect the dots: Trump’s radicalism burns with Trumpian arrogance. Trump is not just smashing and burning his way through the federal government, but through the culture, and the world order. It’s symbolized by a billionaire with a chainsaw; the tattooed swagger of idiots; the cruelty porn of his cabinet members.

And the endless threats of presidential retribution, using the massive cudgel of federal power to cow his critics and his enemies.

His culture of fear worked with the supine GOP. It’s worked with the billionaire tech bros and big media companies. It’s worked with the universities. It’s worked with the quislings in Big Law.

But that was merely prologue.

Each victory, each surrender, each grovel fuels the arrogance. Trump and his claque are emboldened to seize even more power.

Now the massive and arbitrary tariffs mean that the whole world — both nations and industries alike — will have to beg Trump himself for exemptions and relief. He has replaced free markets with the fear and favor of Donald Trump.

“Those trying to understand the tariffs as economic policy are dangerously naive,” notes Senator Chris Murphy. “No, the tariffs are a tool to collapse our democracy. A means to compel loyalty from every business that will need to petition Trump for relief.”

Murphy gets it:

“This week you will read many confused economists and political pundits who won’t understand how the tariffs make economic sense. That’s because they don’t. They aren’t designed as economic policy. The tariffs are simply a new, super dangerous political tool…

What could Trump demand as part of a quiet loyalty pledge? Public shows of support from executives for all his economic policy. Contributions to his political efforts. Promises to police employees’ support for his political opposition.

The tariffs are DESIGNED to create economic hardship. Why? So that Trump has a straight face rationale for releasing them, business by business or industry by industry. As he adjusts or grants relief, it’s a win-win: the economy improves and dissent disappears.

Trump Trashes the Economy

Trump Trashes the Economy

Charlie Sykes

This might be a good time to remind ourselves that this is the same Donald Trump who went bankrupt six times. Including casinos.

Let’s start with Trump’s casinos in Atlantic City:

“The Trump Taj Mahal, which was built and owned by President Trump, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 1991. The Trump Plaza, the Trump Castle, and the Plaza Hotel, all owned by President Trump at the time, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 1992. THCR, which was founded by President Trump in 1995, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2004. Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc., the new name given to Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts after its 2004 bankruptcy, declared bankruptcy in 2009.”

Then there’s the list of “companies that had license agreements with President Trump [that] have failed”:

“Trump Shuttle Inc., launched by President Trump in 1989, defaulted on its loans in 1990 and ceased to exist by 1992. Trump University, founded by President Trump in 2005, ceased operations in 2011 amid lawsuits and investigations regarding the company’s business practices. Trump Vodka, a brand of vodka produced by Drinks Americas under license from the Trump Organization, was introduced in 2005 and discontinued in 2011.”

Also, “Trump Mortgage, LLC, a financial services company founded by President Trump in 2006, ceased operations in 2007. GoTrump.com, a travel site founded by President Trump in 2006, ceased operations in 2007. Trump Steaks, a brand of steak and other meats founded by President Trump in 2007, discontinued sales two months after its launch.”

Etc. etc. etc.

And now back to some history in Misha Glenny’s book:

One group of people, however, saw real opportunity in this dazzling mixture of upheaval, hope and uncertainty. These men (and occasionally women) understood instinctively that rising living standards in the West, increased trade and migration flows, and the greatly reduced ability of many governments to police their countries combined to form a goldmine. They were criminals, organised and disorganised, but they were also good capitalists and entrepreneurs, intent on obeying the laws of supply and demand. As such, they valued economies of scale, just as multinational corporations did, and so they sought out overseas partners and markets to develop industries that were every bit as cosmopolitan as Shell, Nike or McDonald’s. They first became visible in Russia and Eastern Europe, but they were also exerting an influence on countries as far away from one another as India, Colombia and Japan. I spotted them in the early 1990s when I was covering the wars in the former Yugoslavia as the BBC’s Central Europe correspondent. The booty that paramilitary units brought home with them after destroying towns and villages in Croatia and Bosnia was used as capital to establish large criminal empires. The bosses of these syndicates became rich very quickly. Soon, they established smuggling franchises that conveyed illicit goods and services from all over the world into the consumer paradise of the European Union. As a writer on the Balkans, I was invited to many conferences to discuss the political issues behind the disastrous wars in the region. It was not long before I received invitations to gatherings discussing security issues. Politicians, policemen and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) were all hoping to learn what lay behind the immense power of organised crime in the Balkans and beyond. However, most knowledge of the new wave of global crime was anecdotal at best. Nobody had joined up the dots.

Well, maybe some people had found themselves joining the dots but did not publicise the fact, due to fear of repercussions they could not handle.

There are many books by learned researchers which explain the growth, rise, fall and rise again of criminal activity which has become part of global political parties, corporate industries and ‘respectable’ social positions. In the current climate of aggression in trade and battle for resources, it is enlightening to read the following:

https://bpr.studentorg.berkeley.edu/2019/12/16/gangs-and-gulags-how-vladimir-putin-utilizes-organized-crime-to-power-his-mafia-state/

Here is an extract:

This decentralization makes it incredibly difficult to take down, and the Russian government’s implicit support of the vast array of organized crime means that the surge of activity across the European Union won’t be going away any time soon. As demonstrated by its handling of political dissidents and freedom fighters, Russia and Vladimir Putin have little care for the opposition voices to their harsh tactics, whether such opposition comes domestically or from the international community. 

It is likely the stress on nations suffering tariffs might well assist those involved in organized crime, see:

https://insightcrime.org/news/tariffs-wont-upend-fentanyl-migrant-flows-from-mexico/

Sanctions and tariffs are laughable to organised criminals intertwined with the global trade system.

As usual, the most vulnerable in the world are going to take the hit.

And where does gangsterism start? Always where people are mistreated and desperate:

More people in the U.K. are shoplifting food and selling it on the black market

01/03/2024 / By Arsenio Toledo

https://www.starvation.news/2024-01-03-more-people-uk-shoplifting-selling-black-market.html

And you can read of historical roots of Soviet Russia hardline Stalin days of the Vory (“thieves”) as they rose out of brutal times, in ‘Vory: Russia’s Super Mafia’ by Mark Galeotti. He says:

Do the gangsters run Russia? No, of course not, and I have met many determined, dedicated Russian police officers and judges committed to the struggle against them. However, businesses and politicians alike use many methods that owe more to the vorovskoi mir than legal practice, the state hires hackers and arms gangsters to fight its wars, and you can hear vor songs and vor slang on the streets. Even President Putin uses it from time to time to reassert his streetwise credentials. Perhaps the real question, with which this book ends, is not so much how far the state has managed to tame the gangsters, but how far the values and practices of the vory have come to shape modern Russia.

And Trump pardons an admitted guilty money laundering act, using crypto currency, of a corporate:

April 4-6, 2025

Olga Lautman

Apr 7READ IN APP

📆 Trump Tyranny Tracker: April 4-6

Welcome to today’s Trump


🔥 In Corruption News

Trump Just Pardoned … a Corporation?

What Happened: In a highly unusual move, Trump issued a full pardon to HDR Global Trading, the parent company of crypto exchange BitMEX, which had pleaded guilty to violating anti-money laundering laws and was fined $100 million. The pardon came just before the payment deadline and included three of the company’s co-founders.

Why It Matters: Legal experts say this could be the first-ever full presidential pardon granted to a corporation, raising alarm over the precedent it sets. This further blurs the line between corporate accountability and political favoritism, especially as Trump rolls back enforcement actions across the crypto sector and he and his family enrich themselves with crypto.

Source: The Intercept

Posted in anthropocene | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

American People

Consider watching the 1981 documentary ‘The Killing of America’ and don’t be surprised to see how decades later the horror deepens.

Below, Bernie Sanders, whose life spans 8 decades, stands up to reflect on the present day experiences of Americans.

Bernie Sanders March 2025 speech reproduced here:

Mr. President,

In the last couple of weeks, I’ve had the opportunity to travel in many parts of our country. And I have been able to talk to folks in Nebraska, in Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan, Nevada, Colorado, and Arizona. And what I am hearing from in all of these states and in fact all over the country is that our nation right now faces enormous crises, unprecedented crises in the modern history of our country.

And how right now at this moment we respond to these crises will not only impact our lives, it will impact the lives of our kids and future generations. And in terms of climate change, the well-being of the entire planet.

And Mr. President, what I have to tell you is that the American people are angry at what is happening here in Washington, DC and they are prepared to stand up and fight back. In my view and what I have heard from many, many people is that they will not accept an oligarchic form of society where a handful of billionaires control our government, where the wealthiest person on Earth, Mr. Musk, is running all over Washington, DC slashing the Social Security Administration so that our elderly people today are finding it extremely difficult to access the benefits that they paid into.

Where Mr. Musk and his friends are slashing the Veterans Administration so that people who put their lives on the line to defend us will not be able to get the health care that they are entitled to or get the benefits that they are owed in a timely manner. Slashing the Department of Education. Slashing USAID.

And why is all of this slashing taking place? It is taking place so that the wealthiest people in this country can receive over $1 trillion dollars in tax breaks.Rise

Now, I don’t care if you are a Democrat, a Republican, or an Independent. There are very few people in this country who think that you slash programs that working families desperately need in order to give tax breaks to billionaires.

Mr. President, I am the former chair of the U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and I have had the honor of meeting with veterans in my own state of Vermont—all over Vermont—but all over the country. These are the men and women who put the uniform of this country on and have been prepared to die to defend our nation and American democracy.

And these veterans and Americans all over our nation will not accept an authoritarian form of society with a president who undermines our Constitution every day. Every day there’s something else out there where he’s undermining our Constitution and threatening the very foundations of American democracy. That is not what people fought and died to allow to happen.

Mr. President, I am not a historian, but I do know that the founding fathers of this country were no dummies. They were really smart guys. And in the 1780s, they wrote a Constitution and established a form of government with a separation of powers.

A separation of powers—with an executive branch, the president; a legislative branch, the Congress; and a judicial branch.

These revolutionaries in the 1780s had just fought a war against the imperial rule of the King of England who was an absolute dictator, the most powerful person on Earth. And these revolutionaries here in America forming a new government wanted to make absolutely sure that no one person in this brand new country that they were forming would have unlimited powers.

And that is why we have a separation of powers. That is why we have a judiciary, a Congress, and an executive branch. In other words, way back in the 1780s, they wrote a Constitution to prevent exactly what Donald Trump is trying to do today.

So, let us be clear about what is going on. Donald Trump is attacking our First Amendment and is trying to intimidate the media and those who speak out against him in an absolutely unprecedented way.

Mr. President, he has sued ABC, CBS, Meta, the Des Moines Register. His FCC is now threatening to investigate NPR and PBS. He has called CNN and MSNBC “illegal.”

In other words, the leader—or the so-called leader—of the free world is afraid of freedom. He doesn’t like criticism. Well, guess what? None of us like criticism. But you don’t get elected to the Senate, you don’t get elected to the House, you don’t become a governor, you don’t become a president of the United States unless you are prepared to deal with that criticism.

And the response to that criticism in a democracy is not to sue the media, is not to intimidate the media. It’s to respond in the way you think best.

But Mr. President, it is not just the media that Trump is going after. He is going after the constitutional responsibilities that this body, the United States Congress, has. And I will say it amazes me, it really does, how easily my Republican colleagues here in the Senate and in the House are willing to surrender their constitutional responsibilities. Give it over to the president.

Trump has illegally and unconstitutionally withheld funds that Congress has appropriated. You can’t do that. Congress has the power of the purse. We make a decision. We argue about it here. Big debates, vote-aras, the whole thing. Make that decision. That money goes out. The president does not have the right to withhold funds that Congress has appropriated.

Trump has illegally and unconstitutionally decimated agencies that can only be changed or reformed by Congress. You don’t like the Department of Education, you don’t like USAID, fine. Come to the Congress. Tell us what reforms you want to see. You do not have the right to unilaterally do away with these agencies.

Trump has fired members of independent agencies and inspectors general that he does not have the authority to do.

But Mr. President, it is not just the media that he is trying to intimidate. It is not just the powers of Congress that he wants.

Now, in an absolutely outrageous, unconstitutional and extraordinarily dangerous way, he is going after the judiciary. His view is that if you don’t like a decision that a judge renders, you get rid of that judge. You try to impeach that judge. You intimidate judges so that you get the decisions that you want.

You know, I’m thinking back now as someone who is not a supporter of the Roberts court, and I’m thinking about one of the worst Supreme Court decisions that has ever been rendered—that is Citizens United. I’ll say more about that in a moment. And I’m thinking about the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, taking away American women’s right to control their own bodies.

In my view, these were outrageous decisions, unpopular decisions. But it never occurred to me, because maybe I’m old-fashioned and conservative, and I believe that you live by the rule of law, to say, “Hey, look at the decision Roberts made. We’re going to impeach him.”

No, we try to elect a new president who’s going to appoint new Supreme Court justices. That is the system that people have fought and died to defend.

But it’s not just the movement toward oligarchy, which is outraging millions of Americans—Democrats and Republicans, by the way—and it’s not just the movement toward authoritarianism that we are seeing. The American people, especially with Mr. Musk and 13 billionaires in the Trump administration running agency after agency…

The American people are saying as loudly as they can that they will not accept a society of massive economic and wealth inequalities, where the very richest people in our country are becoming much richer while working families are struggling to put food on the table.

Having gone all over this country, I can tell you that the American people are sick and tired of these inequalities and they want an economy that works for all of us—not just the 1%.

You know, Mr. President, we deal with a whole lot of stuff here in the Congress, and you know, virtually all of it is important in one way or another.

But let’s do something, you know, fairly radical today. Let’s try to tell the truth—the real truth—about what is going on in our society today. Something that we don’t talk about too much here in the Senate. We don’t talk about it too much in the House. We don’t talk about it too much in the corporate media.

But the reality is that today we have two Americas. Two very, very different Americas.

And in one of those Americas, the wealthiest people have never ever had it so good. In the whole history of our country, the people on top have never ever had it so good as they have it today.

Today, we have more income and wealth inequality than there has ever been in the history of America. Now, I know we don’t discuss it. You don’t see it much on TV. You don’t hear it talked about here at all. But the American people do not believe that it is appropriate that three people—one, two, three—Mr. Musk, Mr. Bezos, and Mr. Zuckerberg, three Americans, own more wealth than the bottom half of American society. 170 million people. Really? Three people own more wealth than 170 million people? Anybody here think that is vaguely appropriate?

And by the way, those very same three people—the three richest people in America—were right there at Trump’s inaugural, standing right behind the president. So, you want to know what oligarchy is? I know there’s some confusion out there. What is oligarchy? Well, it starts off when you have the three wealthiest people in the country standing right behind the president when he gets inaugurated.

The top 1% in our country now own more wealth than the bottom 90%.

CEOs make 300 times more than their average worker.

And unbelievably—real inflation-accounted-for wages today—the average American worker, if you can believe it, despite a massive increase in worker productivity, is lower today than it was 52 years ago. And during that period, there was a $75 trillion transfer of wealth that went from the bottom 90% to the top 1%. That is the reality of the American economy today. And you know what? Maybe we might want to be talking about that.

And in our America today, in that top America, that one America, the 1% are completely separate and isolated from the rest of the country. You think they get on a subway to get to work? Think they sit in a traffic jam for an hour trying to get to work? Not the case.

They fly around in the jets and the helicopters that they own. They live in their mansions all over the world in their gated communities. They have nannies taking care of their babies. They don’t worry about the cost of child care. And they send their kids to the best private schools and colleges.

Sometimes they vacation not in a Motel 6, not in a national park, but on the very own islands that they have. And on occasion, for the very very richest—just to have for a kick, have a little bit of fun—maybe they’ll spend a few million dollars flying off into space in one of their own spaceships. Sounds like fun.

But it is not just massive income and wealth inequality that we’re dealing with today. We have more concentration of ownership than ever before. While the profits on Wall Street and corporate America soar, a handful of giant corporations dominate sector after sector—whether it’s agriculture, transportation, media, financial services, etc., etc.

Small number of huge corporations—international corporations—dominating sector after sector. And as a result of that concentration of ownership, they are able to charge the American people outrageously high prices for the goods and services we need.

Mr. President, we don’t talk about it too much. Maybe we should. But there are three Wall Street firms—BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street—that combined are the major stockholders in 95% of our corporations. Got that? Three Wall Street firms—three—are the major stockholders in 95% of American corporations.

So, Mr. President, that is one America. People on top doing phenomenally well. Not only do they have economic power, they have enormous political power. That’s what’s going on there. They live like kings. That’s one America.

But there is another America.

And in that other America, 60% of our people are living paycheck to paycheck. And millions of workers from one end of this country to the other are trying to survive on starvation wages.

And unlike Donald Trump, I grew up in a family that lived paycheck to paycheck. And I know the anxieties that my mom and dad had, living in a rent-controlled apartment. Can we afford to buy this? Why did you buy that?

And that’s the story taking place all over America.

What does living paycheck to paycheck mean?

It means that every single day, millions of Americans worry about how they’re going to pay their rent or their mortgage. All over the country, rents are skyrocketing. And people are wondering: What happens—what happens to me and my kids if rent goes up by 20% and I can’t afford it? Where do I live? Do I have to take my kid out of school? Where do I put my kid? In worst case scenario, do I live in my car?

Let’s be clear. There are many people who are working today who are living in the back of their cars.

How do I pay for child care?

I talked to a cop, a guy the other day—a police officer—spending $20,000 a year for child care.

How do I buy decent food for my kids when the price of groceries is off the charts?

What happens if I get sick or my kid gets sick or my mother gets sick and I got a $12,000 deductible and I can’t afford to go to the doctor?

How, at the end of the month, am I going to pay my credit card bill—even though I am being charged 20 or 30% interest rates by the usurious credit card companies?

People are worrying about simple things. What happens if my car breaks down and the guy at the repair shop says it’s going to cost $1,000 and I don’t have $1,000 in the bank? And if I don’t have a car, how do I get to work? And if I don’t get to work, how do I have an income? And if I don’t have an income, how do I take care of my family?

Those are the crises that millions of Americans are experiencing today.

But it’s not just working-age Americans.

Today, in our country, half of older workers—older workers—have nothing in the bank as they face retirement. And they’re watching TV and they’re saying, “Mr. Musk is firing Social Security workers,” and actually worrying whether Social Security will be there for them.

And it’s not just older workers with nothing in the bank wondering what happens when they retire. Twenty-two percent of seniors are trying to survive on $15,000 a year.

I dare anybody in this country—let alone somebody who’s old, who needs health care, needs to keep the house warm—try to survive on $15,000 a year. And there are people here, by the way, talking about cutting Social Security.

Mr. President, it is not just about income and wealth inequality. It is about a health care system which everyone in the nation understands is broken, is dysfunctional, and is outrageously expensive.

I hear my Republican friends—you know, I don’t know where they are today—wanting to destroy the ACA. And my Democratic friends say, “Oh, we got to defend the ACA.” ACA is broken. It doesn’t work.

In my state, the cost of health care is going up 10, 15%. In America today, you got 85 million people uninsured or underinsured.

Function of the health care system today is not to do what a sane society would do—guarantee health care to all people in a cost-effective way—something which, by the way, every other major nation on Earth manages to do.

The function of our health care system, as everybody knows, is to make billions of dollars in profits for the insurance companies and the drug companies.

So I say to my Democratic friends: It’s not good enough to defend the Affordable Care Act. It’s a broken system. You got to have the guts to stand up and allow us to do what every other major nation does—guarantee health care to all people as a human right—not allow the drug companies and the insurance companies to make massive profits every year.

And Mr. President, I want to touch on an issue that gets virtually no discussion, but I think it is enormously important—and it says a hell of a lot about what’s going on in our society today.

In America, according to international studies, our life expectancy—how long we live as a people—is about four years lower than other countries. Most European countries—people there live longer lives. Japan—they live even more longer lives than in Europe.

So, question number one: Why is that happening?

We spend $14,000 a year per person on health care—almost double what any other country spends. And yet people around the world are living, on average, four years longer than we do.

But here is the really ugly fact—even worse than that.

And that is that in this country, on average, if you are a working-class person, you will live seven years shorter lives than if you’re in the top 1%. If you’re a working-class person, your life will be seven years shorter than if you are wealthy.

In other words, being poor or working-class in America today amounts to a death sentence.

Mr. President, it’s not only a broken health care system.

We have got to ask ourselves a simple question—and the Biden administration began a little bit of movement in this direction—and that is: Why are we living in a nation where one out of four people can’t even afford the prescription drugs their doctors prescribe?

Why are we in some cases paying ten times more than our neighbors in Canada or in Europe? How does that happen?

And the answer of course has to do with the greed of the pharmaceutical industry and their power right here—all of the campaign contributions that they make—which has prevented us from negotiating prices.

But it’s not just health care or prescription drugs.

When we look at what’s going on in America—in Vermont and throughout this country—we have a major housing crisis. Here we are, the richest country on Earth: 800,000 people sleeping out on the streets, and 20 million people are spending more than 50% of their limited incomes on housing.

Can you imagine that? You’re a working person, spending 50% of your income on housing. How do you have money to do anything else? And the cost of housing is soaring.

Do not tell me, Mr. President, that in a nation which could spend a trillion dollars on the military—a nation that gives massive tax breaks to the rich—that we cannot build the millions of units of housing that we desperately need.

So, Mr. President, why is all of this happening?

Why do we have a health care system that is broken? Prescription drugs that are the most expensive in the world? A housing system? Education in deep trouble?

Talked to educators in Vermont, all over the country. Talked to a principal the other day from Vermont. Their starting salary at a public school? $32,000 a year. But don’t worry—they can’t afford to even bring people in because they can’t afford the housing in the community.

Why have we let education sink to the level that it has?

So I think the bottom line of all this is: The American people, I think, are catching on. And Mr. Musk—I must thank him—because he has made it very clear we are living in an oligarchic form of society.

If anybody out there thinks that Mr. Musk is running around out of the goodness of his heart trying to make our government more efficient, you have not a clue as to what is going on.

What these guys want to do is destroy virtually every federal program that impacts the well-being of working people—Social Security, Medicare, postal service, public education, you name it—so they can get huge tax breaks for the rich and eventually make government so inefficient that they will have the ability, as large corporations, to come in and privatize everything that is going on.

So, Mr. President, this is a pivotal moment in American history. And I sense that the American people have had it up to here.

They are prepared to fight back.

They do not want a government run by billionaires who have it all—whose greed is uncontrollable.

You know, we have in Vermont—and I think a lot of this country—serious problems with addiction, with drugs. People drinking too much alcohol. People smoking too many cigarettes.

But the worst form of addiction that this country now faces is the greed of the oligarchy.

You might think that if you had 10, 20 billion dollars, it would be enough. You know—kind of enough to let your family live for the next 20 generations.

But it’s not.

For whatever reason—whatever compulsive reason they have—these guys want more and more and more, and they are prepared to destroy Social Security, Medicare, nutrition programs for hungry people in order to get even more.

That, to me, is disgusting.

So, Mr. President, we are at a pivotal moment in American history. But having been all over this country—or many parts of this country—I am absolutely confident that the American people (and I’m not just talking about Democrats, who are as complicit in the problems that we have right now as our Republicans, because we got a two-party system which is basically corrupt)…

You got Mr. Musk over on the Republican side saying to any Republican who dares to stand up and defy the Trump agenda, we are going to primary you.

And on the Democratic side, you got AIPAC and you got other super PACs saying, you stand up for working people—you’re in trouble as well.

We got a corrupt campaign finance system in which billionaires are able to buy elections. And that’s why all over this country, people are not happy with our two-party system—the Republicans and the Democrats.

So, Mr. President, this is a pivotal moment in American history.

But we have had difficult moments before. And I am confident, from the bottom of my heart, that if we stand together, and we do not allow some right-wing extremists to divide us up by the color of our skin, or our religion, or where we were born, or our sexual orientation…

If we stand together, we can save this country. We can defeat oligarchy. We can defeat the movement toward authoritarianism. And in fact, we can create an economy and a government that works for all—not just a few.

Posted in anthropocene | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Oil keeps wars going

Here are some extracts from a .pdf from oil change.org.

The previous blog shows how purchasing oil from a warring nation may constitute aiding war crimes, as the profits from sales can build military capabilities. Here, supplying vital oil to a warring nation (Israel) lends that nation power to destroy lives they deem of no value (Palestinians):

Oil to Israel:

And let us not forget British Petroleum (now BP) for its flouting of so many health and safety rules, so why would it care about supplying the Israeli war machine?

BP has one of the worst safety records of any major oil company that operates in the United States. Between 2007 and 2010, BP refineries in Ohio and Texas accounted for 97% of “egregious, willful” violations handed out by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). BP had 760 “egregious, willful” violations during that period, while Sunoco and Conoco-Phillips each had eight, Citgo two and Exxon had one.[389] The deputy assistant secretary of labour at OSHA, said “The only thing you can conclude is that BP has a serious, systemic safety problem in their company.”[390]

A report in ProPublica, published in The Washington Post in 2010, found that over a decade of internal investigations of BP’s Alaska operations during the 2000s warned senior BP managers that the company repeatedly disregarded safety and environmental rules and risked a serious accident if it did not change its ways. ProPublica found that “Taken together, these documents portray a company that systemically ignored its own safety policies across its North American operations – from Alaska to the Gulf of Mexico to California and Texas. Executives were not held accountable for the failures, and some were promoted despite them.”[391]

The Project On Government Oversight, an independent non-profit organisation in the United States which investigates and seeks to expose corruption and other misconduct, lists BP as number one on their listing of the 100 worst corporations based on instances of misconduct.[392]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

Posted in anthropocene | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Follow the Oil Pipelines

Since 1949, East Germany under Soviet rule to (see below) present day East Germany and links to the Russian oil pipeline which instigated the building of refineries e.g. Schwedt on border with Poland
welt-atlas.de

Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, East Germans have never achieved parity with West German wealth generation. Disgruntled East Germans have raised the profile of right wing AfD political beliefs.

Initially, the AfD distanced itself from far-right parties in neighbouring countries. However, successive leadership changes between 2015 and 2017 saw the party adopt a more hardline position, particularly on immigration, Islam and national identity. By 2016, its platform had largely aligned with those of populist radical right parties elsewhere…….Additionally, the party upholds the white, nuclear family as an ideal and has pledged to dismiss university professors accused of promoting “leftist, woke gender ideology”. The party also calls for the immediate lifting of sanctions against Russia and opposes weapons deliveries to Ukraine.

https://theconversation.com/what-is-the-afd-germanys-far-right-party-explained-250218

Druzhba pipeline 2025 eurodialogue.com

The war in Ukraine led to blocking flow of Russian oil through the Druzhba pipeline to the refineries in East Germany, and they, consequently, were forced to shut down, leading to high unemployment. This led to anger and disagreement with the leading German political party led by Olaf Scholz.

Feeling fed up and ignored by mainstream parties, many in what was East Germany have flocked to the far right – with the AfD picking up more than 38% of the vote in one state.

https://news.sky.com/story/why-was-the-afd-so-successful-in-east-germany-13316403

The refineries are listed here:

https://rosneft.com/business/Downstream/Neftepererabotka/Refining_assets_in_Germany

Moscow, Berlin, and Washington are discussing the resumption of raw material supplies to Germany at Rosneft’s refineries. This could be an argument for a ceasefire with UkraineДоступно на русском

Date

13 Mar 2025

Authors

Marcus Bensmann (CORRECTIV), Alexej Hock (CORRECTIV), David Schraven (CORRECTIV), Nikita Kondratyev

“Russians and Americans Are Clapping Their Hands”
Visit of German government commissioner for Eastern affairs Carsten Schneider to the Schwedt refinery in summer 2024 / Patrick Pleul / dpa

The authorities of Germany, Russia, and the USA are discussing the resumption of oil supplies through the Druzhba pipeline to Germany, investigators from the Correctiv publication, with the participation of IStories, have found out.

For this purpose, American firms will buy out Rosneft Deutschland’s, a German subsidiary of Rosneft, share (54.17%) in the oil refinery PCK in the city of Schwedt near the German-Polish border, say sources familiar with the negotiations.

The PCK refinery was launched back in the GDR in 1961 and, before the full-scale war in Ukraine, was supplied with raw materials from Russia via Druzhba. Its capacity is 11.5 million tons of oil per year; the company reports that 9 out of 10 cars in Berlin and Brandenburg today are filled with gasoline made by the Schwedt refinery. 

In September 2022, the government of Chancellor Olaf Scholz took the refinery under temporary management and planned to nationalize it. Since then, the plant has been supplied via a backup pipeline and the same Druzhba with raw materials from the ports of Rostock and Gdansk, as well as in transit through Russia from Kazakhstan. However, alternative routes have been less profitable from the very beginning.

https://istories.media/en/stories/2025/03/13/russians-and-americans-are-clapping-their-hands/?tztc=1

In addition, since the sabotage of Nord 2, there is a suggestion it may get repaired and if so, restore gas supplies.

The billionaire brothers, Arkady Rotenberg and Boris Rotenberg,who owned the largest construction company for gas pipelines in Russia, are looking to repair the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline.

Check facts

Opinions

Russia is Preparing to Restore the Nord Stream Gas Pipeline, IStories Source Reports

Here are three signs of such preparationДоступно на русском

Date

14 Mar 2025

Author

Roman Katin

Russia is Preparing to Restore the Nord Stream Gas Pipeline, IStories Source Reports
Laying the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline on the bottom of the Baltic Sea, November 2018. Photo: Bernd Wüstnek / dpa / AFP / Scanpix / LETA

IStories has noticed several indirect signs that Russia is preparing to restore the Nord Stream pipelines. And although experts are still skeptical about such a possibility, this is indicated, in particular, by the activity of a company that previously processed pipes for these pipelines — it may be linked to Arkady Rotenberg and former top managers of Gazprom, who are now suspected of siphoning off its assets to the tune of 150 billion rubles.

https://istories.media/en/stories/2025/03/13/russians-and-americans-are-clapping-their-hands/?tztc=1

Moscow, Berlin, and Washington are discussing the resumption of raw material supplies to Germany at Rosneft’s refineries. This could be an argument for a ceasefire with Ukraine

https://istories.media/en/stories/2025/03/13/russians-and-americans-are-clapping-their-hands/?tztc=1

as well as the EU, imposed sanctions against Arkady Rotenberg. U.S. authorities blocked the assets of SMP Bank for at least $65 million. Besides, his assets and the luxurious property was arrested in Italy. In 2017, Russian journalists found out that Arkady Rotenberg systematically evades sanctions. According to the investigation, Rotenberg re-registers his assets and property in Europe to proxies from among the former top managers of his companies. Rotenberg is one of the Russian oligarchs named in the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act, CAATSA, signed into law by President Donald Trump in 2017.

https://www.spisok-putina.org/en/personas/rotenberg-2

Russia depends on funding his war machine with sales of oil and gas and has been hit by sanctions by the US to reduce the sales to countries like Germany, who themselves had to close their supplies in protest to the invasion of Ukraine.

Posted in anthropocene | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Chekov’s Gun

Another great book I’m reading, which helps me stay sane amongst the lies and false statements flying around social media, is Bob Woodward ‘s book, ‘War’.

At the stirrings of the Ukrainian invasion, Woodward reported in his book:

“Chekhov’s gun” was National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan’s immediate thought as he reviewed overhead satellite photos that showed an unprecedented 110,000 Russian troops massing on the border of Ukraine. If a pistol appears conspicuously in the first act of a play it is there for a reason and will be fired at some point, the 19th-century playwright Anton Chekhov had famously written. It was April 2021, only the third month of Biden’s presidency. Sullivan had barely settled into his new office in the White House West Wing. At 44, Sullivan, thin and fair-haired, was the youngest national security adviser since Henry Kissinger. With the discipline of a former marathon runner, Sullivan was the operational coordinator of Biden’s foreign policy. When Biden appointed him, Biden called Sullivan, a former Rhodes Scholar and Yale Law School honors graduate, “a once in a lifetime intellect” and had entrusted him with extraordinary decision-making authority. The intelligence also showed Russian naval forces were actively deploying to the Black Sea, a vast inland body of water bordered by Ukraine and Russia. Flatbed trucks could be seen hauling huge rocket launchers and old Soviet armored personnel carriers. More satellite photos showed Russian tanks, artillery, missiles and naval landing craft being moved into Crimea, on the northern coast of the Black Sea, and along the 1,200-mile land border between Russia and Ukraine. According to the latest CIA psychological profile, Vladimir Putin, the autocratic Russian leader, was defined by his extreme insecurity and imperial ambition. Putin was convinced that he was the only person that could restore Russia to the old Russian empire. He was fixated on Ukraine. What was Putin doing? Sullivan wondered. Was this just an exercise, a war game? Was it purely coercive to gain leverage on Ukraine or to force the United States and Europe to back off any talk that Ukraine might eventually join NATO, the world’s most powerful military and diplomatic alliance? It was also possible, Sullivan thought, that Putin was planning to use the troops to seize more territory in the Donbas. Russia and Ukraine had been fighting in the Donbas, a region in the east with sizable coal reserves, since 2014 when Russia seized neighboring Crimea and control of about a third of the Donbas. Nearly 14,000 people had been killed on both sides. There had been 29 cease-fires, all of which had failed, a sign of festering instability. Sullivan worked in a state of near constant intellectual anxiety. And yet he couldn’t look past the obvious: You don’t move that amount of men or matériel to another country’s border if you are not at least thinking about using them. Was Putin hanging his pistol on the wall? President Biden and Sullivan had debated what the administration’s Russia policy should look like. Biden was clear. “I’m not looking for a reset,” Biden said during his first weeks as president. “I’m not looking for some kind of good relationship, but I want to find a stable and predictable way forward with Putin.” But so far the relationship with Russia was neither good, stable, nor predictable. From their first days in office, Biden and Sullivan had been responding to various acts of Russian aggression. The near fatal poisoning of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny, Russian interference in the 2020 U.S. elections, suggestions that Russians may have paid the Taliban to kill Americans in Afghanistan, and the massive SolarWinds cyberattack on more than 16,000 computer systems worldwide, including U.S. government departments and key private industries. It was one of the worst data breaches in U.S. history. Biden had also upped the tension in an ABC television interview on March 16, when he was asked if he thought Putin was a “killer”? “I do,” Biden said. The Kremlin had called the insult “unprecedented.” Putin withdrew the Russian ambassador from Washington in a show of displeasure……….

……….

American presidents had also been a target of Putin’s theatrics. In 2018, a week before then-President Trump’s summit with Putin in Helsinki, 12 Russian military intelligence agents were indicted in the U.S. for hacking the presidential campaign of Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton in her race against Trump. In a joint press conference following the summit, Putin played to Trump’s ego, flattering him. When Trump was asked about Russian interference in the 2016 election, Putin was rewarded with one of the most extraordinary statements by an American president. “He just said it’s not Russia,” Trump said. “I don’t see any reason why it would be.” Standing side by side, Trump appeared to strongly defend the Russian president and wave off the conclusions of U.S. intelligence agencies, which had unanimously determined that Russia had interfered. Condemnation was swift. Some senior Trump advisers still recoil at the memory of the president siding with Putin over the American intelligence agencies. Putin had again won the moment. Trump’s carelessness was on full display. After returning to the U.S., Trump tweeted, trying to fix the blunder: “I have GREAT confidence in MY intelligence people.”

So the scene was already set for what is happening today.

Posted in anthropocene | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

1980s, Dresden, East Germany, Nato

Because of the seeming alignment of the new administration (regime?) of the United States with Russia, I am reading books which help me try to understand how this dramatic situation has evolved.

1949 to 1989

After the war, the US employed German scientists who had led the world in rocket and other technologies.

In fact, the U.S. armed forces and civilian agencies sought long-term advantages for the United States through the seizure of Third Reich technologies that they saw as superior to, or competitive with, Allied ones—notably aircraft, rockets, and missiles. The people who had invented or designed these weapons were needed to help transfer the technology. So what began as a short-term advisory project quickly evolved into a program of permanent immigration. 

See

https://airandspace.si.edu/stories/editorial/project-paperclip-and-american-rocketry-after-world-war-ii

This incorporation of German expertise helped build the US post war military knowledge which became the envy of the world, and triggered the Russian desire to steal its secrets.

To find more about those scientists relocated to US soil, follow the link below to learn how their sinister past was of no interest compared to the value of their research knowledge. They taught eager US weapons scientists and substantially contributed  to the growing military industrial complex.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/09/16/fact-check-nazi-scientists-brought-u-s-operation-paperclip/5690870002

Extract below from ‘Putin’s People’,  by Elizabeth Belton:

Dresden, East Germany. Putin working as a KGB agent organising recruitment of German students to assist the Soviet Union developing technology in rocket and  aircraft design through espionage of western industry.

The Stasi owned a tourist hotel on the river Elbe where visiting scientists would stay and get honey trapped, then blackmailed into revealing trade secrets.

The hotel was owned by the Stasi’s department of tourism, and its palatial restaurants, cosy bars and elegant bedrooms were fitted out with hidden cameras and bugs. Visiting businessmen were honey-trapped with prostitutes, filmed in their rooms and then blackmailed into working for the East.[25] ‘Of course, it was clear to me we used female agents for these purposes. Every security service does this. Sometimes women can achieve far more than men,’ said Jehmlich with a laugh.[26]……….

…..Putin’s chief tasks was gathering information on NATO, the ‘main opponent’,[27] and Dresden was an important outpost for recruiting in Munich and in Baden-Württemberg five hundred kilometres away, both home to US military personnel and NATO troops.[28]

……….

‘Most of the East German high-tech smuggling came through Dresden,’ said Franz Sedelmayer, a West German security consultant who later worked with Putin in St Petersburg and started out in the eighties in the family business in Munich selling defence products to NATO and the Middle East.[9] ‘Dresden was a centre for this black trade.’ It was also a centre for the Kommerzielle Koordinierung, a department within the East German foreign trade ministry that specialised in smuggling operations for high-tech goods under embargo from the West. ‘They were exporting antiques and importing high-tech. They were exporting arms and importing high-tech,’ said Sedelmayer. ‘Dresden was always important for the microelectronics industry,’ said Horst Jehmlich.[10] The espionage unit headed by East Germany’s legendary spymaster Markus Wolf ‘did a lot’ for this, added Jehmlich. He remained tight-lipped, however, on what exactly they did. The Dresden Stasi foreign-intelligence chief, Herbert Kohler, served at the same time as head of its information and technology intelligence unit,[11] a sign of how important smuggling embargoed goods was for the city. Ever since Germany was carved up between East and West in the aftermath of World War II, much of the eastern bloc had relied on the black market and smuggling to survive. The Soviet Union’s coffers were empty after the ravages of the war, and in East Berlin, Zürich and Vienna organised-crime groups worked hand in hand with the Soviet security services to smuggle cigarettes, alcohol, diamonds and rare metals through the black market to replenish the cash stores of the security services of the eastern bloc. Initially the black-market trade had been seen as a temporary necessity, the Communist leaders justifying it to themselves as a blow against the foundations of capitalism. But when, in 1950, the West united against the Soviet-controlled bloc to place an embargo on all high-tech goods that could be used for military means, smuggling became a way of life. The free choices of capitalism and the drive for profit in the West were fuelling a boom in technological development there. By comparison, the planned socialist economy of the eastern bloc was frozen far behind. Its enterprises were bound only to meet annual production plans, its workers and scientists left to procure even the most basic goods through informal connections on the grey market. Isolated by the Iron Curtain, smuggling became the only way for the eastern bloc to keep up with the rapidly developing achievements of the capitalist West.[12]

As I mentioned in my recent 12th March piece, ‘The Long Game’ I quote extracts from Chris Unger’s book ‘American Kompromat’. He writes of the targeting of a young Donald Trump as an American asset by the now expanded Russian Mafia into America. This was in 1987.

Chris Unger also tells us how easy it was to get the Jewish emigres, forced to work covertly for the KGB in return for a life in America, to infiltrate the United Nations:

According to Shvets, the awkward legend was often a tell that revealed how the KGB disguised and falsified the personal histories of its operatives. As a result, he looked for how Jews and other beleaguered ethnic minorities were given perks by the KGB if they played along; how some jobs at the United Nations and in the USSR were reserved for those in the KGB; which institutions were really KGB fronts; and how disinformation was disseminated to hide the truth. When tradecraft was poorly done, he said, it was a dead giveaway…………………………….In the end, of course, their various lucrative enterprises would create the need to launder untold billions of dollars, a need that could best be filled by a wealthy real estate developer who had loads of luxury condos to sell and was willing to look the other way when it came to the source of the money. To a large extent, Trump’s involvement with the Russian Mafia and his subsequent financial dealings with the Russians is a matter of public record—even though it was strikingly absent from the Mueller Report. For more than three decades, at least thirteen people with known or alleged links to the Russian Mafia held the deeds to, lived in, or ran criminal operations out of Trump Tower in New York or other Trump properties. Many of them used Trump-branded real estate to launder vast amounts of money by buying multimillion-dollar condos through anonymous shell companies. And the Bayrock Group, the real estate development company that was based in Trump Tower and had ties to the Kremlin, came up with a new business model to franchise Trump condos after he’d lost billions of dollars in his Atlantic City casino developments—all of which made the perpetually bankrupt Donald Trump rich again and would lead to a new post-Soviet age of kleptocracy, in which America was injected with the virus of oligarchy and ended up with Donald Trump in the White House.

The US website, link shown below, describes the spread and influence of the Russian Mafia in the US and 50 other countries. Organised Crime has gone hand in hand with politics for decades:

The Red Mafiya is the most brilliant and savage Russian mob organization in the world; the Russian mob virtually controls Russia. In addition, both the Bush and the Clinton Administrations have unwittingly facilitated the Russian mob and the untrammeled corruption of Russia since the fall of the Soviet Union. The Russian Mafiya’s invasion of politics in the United States is still in its early stages, but it already poses a huge threat to United States national security interests abroad….

https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/red-mafiya-how-russian-mob-has-invaded-america

2015:

Eastern Ukrainian Bratva flourishing to help foment the unrest in Ukraine:

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/gangs-russia-ruthless-mafia-networks-extending-their-influence-1495644

Present day Russian linked criminal networks assist continuing sanction escape and flow of weapons and goods.

See:

Russia, Ukraine, and organized crime and illicit economies in 2024

It is also worth considering the impact of Russian Jews on the Palestinian population, though not because of crime, but sheer numbers needing homes and jobs:

https://merip.org/1993/05/russian-jewish-immigration-and-the-future-of-the-israeli-palestinian-conflict/

Posted in anthropocene | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bereaved Families for Peace

I watched today Robi express her anxiety now Gaza has been bombed once more with hundreds, especially children, slaughtered. She had hoped the ceasefire would continue, hostages released and the ‘day after’ leading to a sovereign Palestinian State side by side in Peace with Israel.

See her website:

https://www.theparentscircle.org/en/stories/robi-damelin_eng

פורום משפחות שכולת

Robi Dameli – Personal Story

I came to Israel from South Africa in 1967; I came as a volunteer after the Six Day War, thinking I’d be here for about six months. I really wanted to leave South Africa because I’d been active in the anti–apartheid movement and it was getting very pressured and ugly. I actually wanted to live in the States, then I came here and I’ve had this sort of love–hate relationship with this country ever since. I went to a Hebrew language program, got married and had two kids, worked for the Jerusalem Post, and then with immigrants to help them find employment. After I got divorced I came to live in Tel Aviv.

I brought up my children in a very tolerant and loving liberal way; David and Eran, it was kind of like a triangle – the three of us. David went to the Thelma Yellin School of the Arts because he was a very gifted musician. Out of his whole class he was probably the only one who went to the army. I was really surprised when he chose that, but I think you can’t take responsibility for somebody else’s life, even if it is your child. Even in his regular army service David was torn because he didn’t want to serve in the Occupied Territories. He became an officer and was called to go to Hebron. He was in a terrible quandary and came to me and said, “What the hell am I going to do? I don’t want to be there.” I said, “If you want to go to jail I’ll support you, but are you going to make a difference if you go to jail”. Because basically, if he were sent to jail, when he got out they’d put him somewhere else [in the Occupied Territories]. It’s a never–ending story. If it would have created a huge noise then maybe that would have been the right choice; but you can also go [to your military post] and lead by example, by treating people around you with respect.

I saw the scars in both of my children after serving the military, from having to be in the first intifada. They grew up in a home that never made any fuss over one’s creed or color; we just liked people. All through this army service that was what happened all the time [debating whether to serve in the Territories], and then this group was formed of officers that did not want to serve in the Occupied Territories and David joined and went to all the demonstrations; he was also part of the peace movement.

After the army David went to Tel Aviv University and studied philosophy and psychology and then started to do his Masters in Philosophy of Education. He was teaching philosophy at a pre–military program for potential social leaders and he was also teaching at Tel Aviv University. Then he got called up for reserve duty [milu’im] and the whole issue came up again: he doesn’t want to go, if he goes he doesn’t want to serve in the Occupied Territories. If he doesn’t go he’s letting his soldiers down, what kind of example is it for these kids who are going to be inducted into the army in two months, if he goes he would treat anybody, any Palestinian, with respect, and so would his soldiers by his example. I said, “Maybe you are setting a good example [by refusing to go]” and he said, “I can’t let my soldiers down and if I don’t go someone else will and will do terrible things.” I keep telling everybody that there isn’t really black and white.

David went to his reserve service and I was filled with a terrible premonition, of fear I suppose. He called me on that Saturday and said, “I have done everything to protect us. You know I love my life, but this is a terrible place, I feel like a sitting duck.” He never shared that kind of stuff with me, ever. My kids never told me what they were doing in the army. They always told me ridiculous stories thinking that I was going believe them. The next morning I got up very early and ran to work hours before I had to be there. I didn’t want to be at home, I had a very restless feeling.

David was killed by a sniper, along with nine other people. They were at a checkpoint, a political checkpoint, near Ofra. Two days after he was killed it was pulled down; they removed the checkpoint. I suppose all of my life I spoke about coexistence and tolerance. That must be ingrained in me because one of the first things I said is, “You may not kill anybody in the name of my child.” I suppose that’s quite unusual, an unexpected reaction to that kind of news.
It is impossible to describe what it is to lose a child. Your whole life is totally changed forever. It’s not that I’m not the same person I was. I’m the same person with a lot of pain. Wherever I go, I carry this with me. You try to run away at the beginning, but you can’t. I went overseas. I went to India, I came back again, but it just goes with you wherever you go. I had a PR office and I was working with National Geographic and the History Channel and had clients I did food and wine for and all the good things in life, as well as with coexistence projects with Palestinian–Israeli citizens. I wasn’t particularly politically involved, it was much more on a social level: animal welfare, children, coexistence projects. I always did a lot of volunteer work; I put a lot into those kinds of things, it’s always been a part of who I am. But my work began to lose all joy for me. My priorities changed completely. To sit in a meeting and decide whether a wine should be marketed in one way or another became totally irrelevant to me; I couldn’t bear it. I was just very lucky, I had wonderful girls working with me in the office and they really ran the office for me for a year until I decided I couldn’t bear it anymore, and I closed the office.

Yitzhak Frankenthal had come to speak to me; he was the founder of the Bereaved Families Forum. I wasn’t sure that was the path I wanted to take, but I went to a seminar. There were a lot of Israelis and Palestinians from the group there and I didn’t really feel convinced yet. But the more time went by the more I wanted to work somewhere to make a difference. It was the beginning of understanding how not to be patronizing; that’s a really easy trap to fall into in this kind of work: “I know what’s best for the Palestinians, let me tell them what to do.” It took me time to understand, to look at the differences in temperament, in culture, in all these things, to be much less judgmental than I’d always been. I think David was a much more tolerant person than I am, or a less judgmental person. I learned a lot of lessons from him, and the pain created a space in me that was less egocentric, that I know what’s best for everybody.

David was killed on March 3rd 2002. On October 2004 the sniper who killed David was caught, which for me was a huge step. That was really the test. Do I actually mean what I’m saying or am I just saying it because… That is the test of whether I really have integrity in the work I’m doing. Do I really mean what I’m saying when I talk about reconciliation. I wrote a letter to the family. It took me about four months to make the decision, many sleepless nights and a lot of searching inside myself about whether this is what I really mean. I wrote them a letter, which two of the Palestinians from our group delivered to the family. They promised to write me a letter. It will take time; these things take time, I’m waiting. It could take five years for them to do that. They will deliver the letter that I wrote to their son who is in jail. So in my own personal development, this was the big milestone for me. When he was caught I didn’t feel anything; not satisfaction, except maybe satisfaction that he can’t do it to anybody else. There is no sense of revenge and I have never looked for that.

These past years have been an incredible experience for me. I’ve learned such a lot for my own personal growth, apart from the work I’m doing, which is almost the reason I get up in the morning, actually. It’s something I feel almost duty–bound to be doing; it’s not a favor that I’m doing for anyone else but a personal mission almost. I know this works. I believe removing the stigma from each side and getting to know the person on the other side allows for a removal of fear, and a way to understand that a long–term reconciliation process is possible. That’s also based on my background as a South African person, seeing the miracle of South Africa and how that all happened and that it was actually possible.

On David’s grave there is a quotation by Khalil Gibran that says, “The whole earth is my birthplace and all humans are my brothers.”

The letter:
This for me is one of the most difficult letters I will ever have to write. My name is Robi Damelin, I am the mother of David who was killed by your son. I know he did not kill David because he was David, if he had known him he could never have done such a thing. David was 28 years old, he was a student at Tel–Aviv University doing his masters in the Philosophy of Education, David was part of the peace movement and did not want to serve in the occupied territories. He had a compassion for all people and understood the suffering of the Palestinians, he treated all around him with dignity. David was part of the movement of the Officers who did not want to serve in the occupied territories but nevertheless for many reasons he went to serve when he was called to the reserves.
What makes our children do what they do? They do not understand the pain they are causing your son by now having to be in jail for many years and mine who I will never be able to hold and see again or see him married , or have a grandchild from him. I cannot describe to you the pain I feel since his death and the pain of his brother and girl–friend, and all who knew and loved him.

All my life I have spent working for causes of co–existence, both in South Africa and here. After David was killed I started to look for a way to prevent other families both Israeli and Palestinian from suffering this dreadful loss. I was looking for a way to stop the cycle of violence, nothing for me is more sacred than human life, no revenge or hatred can ever bring my child back. After a year, I closed my office and joined the Parents Circle – Families Forum. We are a group of Israeli and Palestinian families who have all lost an immediate family member in the conflict. We are

looking for ways to create a dialogue with a long–term vision of reconciliation.
After your son was captured, I spent many sleepless nights thinking about what to do, should I ignore the whole thing, or will I be true to my integrity and to the work that I am doing and try to find a way for closure and reconciliation. This is not easy for anyone and I am just an ordinary person, not a saint, I have now come to the conclusion that I would like to try to find a way to reconcile. Maybe this is difficult for you to understand or believe, but I know that in my heart it is the only path that I can choose, for if what I say is what I mean it is the only way.
I understand that your son is considered a hero by many of the Palestinian people, he is considered to be a freedom fighter, fighting for justice and for an independent viable Palestinian state, but I also feel that if he understood that taking the life of another may not be the way and that if he understood the consequences of his act, he could see that a non–violent solution is the only way for both nations to live together in peace.
Our lives as two nations are so intertwined, each of us will have to give up on our dreams for the future of the children who are our responsibility.

I give this letter to people I love and trust to deliver, they will tell you of the work we are doing, and perhaps create in your hearts some hope for the future. I do not know what your reaction will be, it is a risk for me, but I believe that you will understand, as it comes from the most honest part of me. I hope that you will show the letter to your son, and that maybe in the future we can meet.

Let us put an end to the killing and look for a way through mutual understanding and empathy to live a normal life, free of violence.

If you have lost a family member due to the conflict, and you are also tired of the never ending cycle of loss of life, we would like to see you with us

Join Us

YOU TOO CAN PROMOTE PEACE AND RECONCILIATION

The PCFF monthly newsletter is published in two languages: One in Hebrew, one in Arabic.
If you wish to sign up please do so, respectively:

Join Our Newsletter

Our Latest Newsletter

HELP US PROMOTE THE PCFF ACTIVITIES

Help us to spread the message of peace and reconciliation

DONATE

Menu

THE PARENTS CIRCLE – FAMILIES FORUM (PCFF)

The Israeli Office
Ramat Efal
Tel. 03-5355089

The Palestinian Office
Beit Jala
Tel. 02-2754447

Posted in anthropocene | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment